The Child Opportunity Index and Outcomes After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND

Research at the intersection between social determinants of health (SDOH) and orthopaedics remains an area of active exploration, with recent literature demonstrating significant disparities in a wide array of orthopaedic outcomes in patients with different SDOH.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to use a validated composite measure of SDOH mapped to census tracts (Child Opportunity Index [COI]) to explore disparities in functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It was hypothesized that patients with a lower COI score would have delayed surgical care and worse functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Demographic, surgical, and functional outcomes data were extracted for all patients aged ≤18 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at our institution between 2009 and 2019. Strength deficits were calculated, and COI quintile scores were obtained. One-way analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test were used to compare variables of interest between the lower 2 quintiles (low group) and the upper 2 quintiles (high group).

RESULTS

Of the 1027 patients, 226 (22.0%) were in the low group, while 801 (78.0%) were in the high group. There was a significantly greater time from injury to surgery in the low group than in the high group (98.15 ± 102.65 vs 71.79 ± 101.88 days, respectively; < .001). The low group had a significantly lower extension-flexion range of motion at 1- and 3-month follow-up ( = .03 and = .02, respectively) but no difference at 6-month follow-up ( = .27). The low group attended fewer physical therapy visits than the high group (24.82 ± 10.55 vs 37.81 ± 18.07, respectively; < .001). The low group had significant deficits in quadriceps strength at 3, 6, and 9 months at 180 deg/s ( = .03, < .001, and = .01, respectively) and at 6 months at 300 deg/s ( = .002).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that the COI was associated with disparities in key clinical outcomes including time to surgery, postoperative range of motion, and postoperative strength.