Suppr超能文献

放化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Clinical Medicine Centre, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1459693. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1459693. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is a standard method for treating locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely applied in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer, metastatic cervical cancer or LACC. The efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus immunotherapy for LACC require further investigation. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) combined with ICIs for treating LACC on the basis of the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify RCTs that focused on CCRT plus ICIs for LACC treatment. The outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). A standard method for systematic review and meta-analysis was used. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data combination and analyses.

RESULTS

Three RCTs involving 1882 participants with LACC were identified and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. CCRT plus ICIs improved the rates of PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: CI: 0.64, 0.91, = 0.002) and OS (HR: 0.7695% CI (95% CI 0.58-0.99, = 0.04) in patients with LACC. Compared with the control group, the CCRT plus immunotherapy group had an increased ORR (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02,1.85, =0.04). The two methods had similar rates (HR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.43; =0.07) of treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs. The CCRT plus immunotherapy group had a higher rate than did the control group (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.38, 5.21; 0.004) in terms of any grade immunotherapy-related AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

CCRT plus ICIs is efficacious and safe for the management of LACC. The addition of ICIs to CCRT improved the rates of PFS and OS in patients with LACC. The adverse effects of immunotherapy-related AEs should be strictly examined and managed in a timely manner.

摘要

背景

放疗联合化疗是治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的标准方法。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)广泛应用于复发性宫颈癌、转移性宫颈癌或 LACC 的治疗。放疗联合免疫治疗 LACC 的疗效和安全性需要进一步研究。本综述和荟萃分析的目的是基于随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,分析放化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗 LACC 的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们全面检索电子数据库,以确定侧重于 LACC 治疗的 CCRT 联合 ICIs 的 RCT。结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)。采用标准的系统评价和荟萃分析方法。使用 Review Manager 5.4 进行数据组合和分析。

结果

共纳入 3 项 RCT,涉及 1882 例 LACC 患者,进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。CCRT 联合 ICI 可提高 LACC 患者的 PFS 率(风险比[HR]:0.76,95%置信区间[CI]:0.64-0.91, = 0.002)和 OS 率(HR:0.7695%CI(95%CI 0.58-0.99, = 0.04)。与对照组相比,CCRT 联合免疫治疗组的 ORR 更高(OR:1.37,95%CI:1.02-1.85, = 0.04)。两种方法的治疗相关 3 级或更高 AEs 发生率相似(HR=1.99,95%CI:0.99,1.43; = 0.07)。CCRT 联合免疫治疗组任何级别免疫治疗相关 AEs 的发生率均高于对照组(HR:2.68,95%CI:1.38-5.21; 0.004)。

结论

CCRT 联合 ICI 治疗 LACC 有效且安全。在 CCRT 中加入 ICI 可提高 LACC 患者的 PFS 和 OS 率。应严格检查和及时处理免疫治疗相关 AEs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de2/11439685/de7d13fb40fc/fimmu-15-1459693-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验