Mulder Louisa T M A, Berghmans Danielle D P, Feczko Peter Z, de Bie Rob A, Lenssen Antoine F
Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J Orthop. 2024 Jul 30;59:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
To examine the feasibility of conducting a preoperative home-based prehabilitation program for total knee arthroplasty patients at risk for delayed in-hospital recovery, and to explore the pre- and postoperative impact of this program.
A retrospective cohort study with matched controls, enabling subgroup analyses.
Home-based.
Patients awaiting primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty between 2019 and 2020, were compared with matched historic cases from 2016 to 2017. Matching criteria were scoring ≤17 points on the De Morton Mobility Index and >12.5 s on the timed-up-and-go test.
Supervised home-based prehabilitation program versus no prehabilitation.
Feasibility, determined by recruitment rate, adherence, and safety of the program. Preoperative impact, assessed for the intervention group by differences in mean values for aerobic capacity, muscle strength and functional mobility between the first and last sessions. Postoperative impact was defined as the time needed to achieve in-hospital independence of physical function and was measured by the differences in mean values between the intervention and control groups.
Recruitment rate was 71 %; adherence and drop-out rates were 88 % and 12 % respectively. No adverse events were reported. Preoperatively, the intervention group showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity on the 2-min walking test (84.29 m-98.06 m; p = 0.007) and 2-min step test (40.35 steps to 52.95 steps; p = 0.014), muscle strength on the 30 s chair stand test (7.3 stands to 10.1 stands; p = 0.002), and functional mobility as seen in the timed-up-and-go-test (19.52 s-15.85 s; p = 0.031). Postoperatively, the intervention group achieved in-hospital independence of physical function earlier (mean rank 16.11) than the control group (mean rank 24.89; p=<0.01).
It is feasible to conduct a prehabilitation program 4-6 weeks preoperatively, for high-risk patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, the program appears to have a positive impact on physical fitness both pre- and postoperatively.
探讨为有住院恢复延迟风险的全膝关节置换术患者开展术前居家预康复计划的可行性,并探究该计划对术前和术后的影响。
一项带有匹配对照组的回顾性队列研究,以便进行亚组分析。
居家。
将2019年至2020年间等待初次单侧全膝关节置换术的患者与2016年至2017年的匹配历史病例进行比较。匹配标准为德莫顿运动指数得分≤17分,定时起立行走测试用时>12.5秒。
有监督的居家预康复计划与无预康复措施。
可行性通过招募率、依从性和计划安全性来确定。术前影响通过干预组第一次和最后一次训练之间有氧能力、肌肉力量和功能活动能力的平均值差异来评估。术后影响定义为实现住院期间身体功能独立所需的时间,并通过干预组和对照组之间的平均值差异来衡量。
招募率为71%;依从率和退出率分别为88%和12%。未报告不良事件。术前,干预组在2分钟步行测试中的有氧能力有显著改善(从84.29米提高到98.06米;p = 0.007),在2分钟台阶测试中(从40.35步增加到52.95步;p = 0.014),在30秒坐立测试中的肌肉力量(从7.3次增加到10.1次;p = 0.002),以及在定时起立行走测试中显示的功能活动能力(从19.52秒缩短到15.85秒;p = 0.031)。术后,干预组比对照组更早实现住院期间身体功能独立(平均秩次16.11)(平均秩次24.89;p<0.01)。
为等待全膝关节置换术的高危患者在术前4 - 6周开展预康复计划是可行的。此外,该计划似乎对术前和术后的身体素质都有积极影响。