Evaluation of antenatal care quality for preterm birth prevention using an auditable scoring system: A retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal study in Sydney, Australia.

INTRODUCTION

Preterm birth continues to be one of the most significant contributors to perinatal death. This study aims to evaluate the quality of antenatal care provided to women delivering preterm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal review of all women who had antenatal care within a single Australian tertiary hospital and delivered spontaneously between 24 and 37 weeks of gestation, using an auditable scoring system assessing potential interventions for prevention of preterm birth. The review was limited to singleton pregnancies without fetal abnormalities delivering between January 2013 and April 2015. The audit tool was developed by reference to established 'best practice' guidance for prediction and prevention of preterm birth based on Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines and published literature. Different pathways were assessed for women deemed either low- or high-risk at the outset of antenatal care.

RESULTS

A series of 161 pregnancies that delivered preterm (between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation) were reviewed. The quality of antenatal care was scored 'good' in 42.9% and 50% of high-risk and low-risk women, respectively. Care was scored 'adequate', with room for improvement in 51.4% and 45.2% of the two corresponding groups. The main deficiencies in care were recorded evidence of assessment of cervical length (absent in 35% of cases) and failure to screen for bacterial vaginosis in high-risk women.

CONCLUSIONS

Auditing antenatal care for prevention of preterm birth allows identification of suboptimal practice allowing service improvement and potential intervention for preterm birth prevention.