Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2024 Oct 1;32(9):417-424. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001223. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
For patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), treatment with pembrolizumab is dependent on the accurate determination of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). This study evaluated the interobserver concordance in assessing PD-L1 expression on TNBC samples using the commercial 22C3 IHC assay and an in-house assay based on the E1L3N antibody. Concordance between the 22C3 and the E1L3N IHC assays was evaluated on TNBC samples read by a commercial laboratory and a Brigham and Women's Hospital breast pathologist (BWH reader). Each slide was given a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and was considered PD-L1 positive or negative based on the CPS cutoff of 10. Interobserver concordance for the assays was also evaluated on a subset of samples between 2 and 3 independent readers. On 71 samples, 2 independent readers (1 BWH reader and commercial laboratory) using E1L3N and 22C3, respectively, reached agreement on PD-L1 status (positive/negative) on 64 samples (90.1%). Using 22C3, 2 independent readers reached agreement on PD-L1 status on 30 of 36 samples (83.3%), and 3 independent readers reached agreement on 16 of 27 samples (59.3%). Using E1L3N, 2 BWH readers reached agreement on PD-L1 status on 18 of 27 samples (66.7%). Three BWH readers reached an agreement on 2 of 12 of the most challenging samples (16.7%). In conclusion, concordance between E1L3N and 22C3 testing using CPS for PD-L1 in metastatic TNBC was >90%. However, certain cases were challenging to agree upon using current threshold criteria, highlighting the need for more standardized evidence-based methods to assess PD-L1 expression.
对于转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者,使用 pembrolizumab 治疗取决于使用免疫组织化学(IHC)准确确定程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达。本研究评估了使用商业 22C3 IHC 检测试剂盒和基于 E1L3N 抗体的内部检测试剂盒评估 TNBC 样本中 PD-L1 表达的观察者间一致性。商业实验室和 Brigham and Women's Hospital 乳腺病理学家(BWH 读者)读取的 TNBC 样本评估了 22C3 和 E1L3N IHC 检测试剂盒之间的一致性。每个载玻片都给出了 PD-L1 综合阳性评分(CPS),并根据 CPS 截断值 10 将其判定为 PD-L1 阳性或阴性。在 2 至 3 位独立读者之间的样本子集中还评估了检测方法的观察者间一致性。在 71 个样本中,使用 E1L3N 和 22C3 的 2 位独立读者(1 位 BWH 读者和商业实验室)在 64 个样本(90.1%)上达成了 PD-L1 状态(阳性/阴性)的一致意见。使用 22C3,2 位独立读者在 36 个样本中的 30 个样本上达成了 PD-L1 状态的一致意见,3 位独立读者在 27 个样本中的 16 个样本上达成了一致意见(59.3%)。使用 E1L3N,2 位 BWH 读者在 27 个样本中的 18 个样本上达成了 PD-L1 状态的一致意见(66.7%)。3 位 BWH 读者在 12 个最具挑战性样本中的 2 个样本上达成了一致意见(16.7%)。总之,转移性 TNBC 中使用 CPS 进行 PD-L1 检测时,E1L3N 和 22C3 检测之间的一致性>90%。然而,使用当前的阈值标准,某些病例难以达成一致,这突出表明需要更标准化的基于证据的方法来评估 PD-L1 表达。