Pomeroy J C, Ricketts B
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;147:508-16. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.5.508.
A comparison was made of initial assessment, treatment, and pattern of care of two groups of non-psychotic patients, referred to a Central London psychiatric outpatient department. The patients, none of whom had been in recent psychiatric treatment, were differentiated into those receiving short-term care (less than one year) and those having long-term care (greater than one year). Chronic psychiatric disorders predominated in both groups. It was also common to have physical illness and contact with other hospital departments. Short-term care consisted of very brief contact for 70% of patients, and psychiatrists seemed unable to engage these referrals in treatment. Long-term attendance was associated with acutely ill young, or chronically ill older patients, more active initial intervention, and referral within the same hospital group. Follow-up revealed that long-term patients reported little symptomatic improvement, experienced considerable disruption in course of care, made increased demands on all aspects of psychiatric service, and often proved to have personality disturbance and social problems that were not perceived on initial contact. Types of intervention and their effects on other hospital departments were examined.
对两组非精神病患者的初始评估、治疗及护理模式进行了比较,这些患者被转诊至伦敦市中心的一家精神科门诊部。患者中近期均未接受过精神科治疗,被分为接受短期护理(少于一年)和长期护理(多于一年)两组。两组中慢性精神疾病均占主导。同时患有躯体疾病并与其他医院科室有接触的情况也很常见。70%的患者接受的短期护理包含非常短暂的接触,精神科医生似乎无法让这些转诊患者参与治疗。长期就诊与急性发病的年轻患者或慢性患病的老年患者、更积极的初始干预以及在同一医院集团内的转诊有关。随访显示,长期患者报告症状改善甚微,在护理过程中经历了相当大的干扰,对精神科服务的各个方面提出了更多需求,并且往往被证明存在初次接触时未察觉到的人格障碍和社会问题。研究了干预类型及其对其他医院科室的影响。