• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全甲状腺切除术应用 CoolSeal 新的安全快速血管闭合系统的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of CoolSeal - a new, safe, and fast vessel sealing device in total thyroidectomy.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Endocr Regul. 2024 Oct 1;58(1):181-186. doi: 10.2478/enr-2024-0021. Print 2024 Jan 1.

DOI:10.2478/enr-2024-0021
PMID:39352779
Abstract

CoolSeal is a new vessel sealing system for dissection and hemostasis during surgery. No clinical studies have investigated safety, advantages or disadvantages regarding the use of this device. The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety of CoolSeal and compare it with conventional ligation technique or LigaSure during the total thyroidectomy. We hypothesized that the use of CoolSeal would reduce the operating time and bleeding without complications increase. Study design represents a retrospective cohort study with a tertiary reference center setting. We analyzed total thyroidectomy data from January 2021 to June 2023. We recorded patients' characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative outcome. We performed 221 total thyroidectomies in the study period. Analysis was restricted to 171 patients operated by only two surgeons. Hemostasis was secured by conventional ligation in 117 patients (68%), LigaSure in 34 patients (20%) and CoolSeal in 20 patients (12%). Median thyroid weight and bleeding were 67 g and 50 ml, respectively. Procedures using LigaSure or Cool-Seal were on larger glands (median 205 g) without increased bleeding (50 ml). Operating time was shortest with CoolSeal (96 min, p=0.003) compared with LigaSure (117 min) or conventional ligation (115 min). Bleeding was reduced with CoolSeal compared with LigaSure (45 vs. 100 ml, p=0.003). With CoolSeal, median hospitalization was one postoperative day, no patients required re-operation. There was no palsy of recurrent laryngeal nerves and no permanent hypoparathyroidism. In our first clinical experience, CoolSeal was safe and efficient for total thyroidectomy. With a small sample size, we saw a clinical benefit with reduced operating time without post-operative complications increase.

摘要

CoolSeal 是一种用于手术中解剖和止血的新型血管密封系统。目前还没有研究调查使用该设备的安全性、优势或劣势。本研究旨在调查 CoolSeal 的安全性,并将其与传统结扎技术或 LigaSure 在全甲状腺切除术的使用进行比较。我们假设使用 CoolSeal 可以减少手术时间和出血,而不会增加并发症。研究设计代表了一项回顾性队列研究,具有三级参考中心设置。我们分析了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间的全甲状腺切除术数据。我们记录了患者的特征、手术信息和术后结果。在研究期间进行了 221 例全甲状腺切除术。分析仅限于仅由两位外科医生进行的 171 例患者。117 例(68%)患者采用常规结扎止血,34 例(20%)患者采用 LigaSure 止血,20 例(12%)患者采用 CoolSeal 止血。甲状腺重量和出血量中位数分别为 67 克和 50 毫升。使用 LigaSure 或 Cool-Seal 的手术是在更大的腺体上进行的(中位数 205 克),但出血量没有增加(50 毫升)。与 LigaSure(117 分钟)或常规结扎(115 分钟)相比,CoolSeal 的手术时间最短(96 分钟,p=0.003)。与 LigaSure 相比,CoolSeal 可减少出血(45 比 100 毫升,p=0.003)。使用 CoolSeal,中位住院时间为术后一天,无患者需要再次手术。没有喉返神经麻痹,也没有永久性甲状旁腺功能减退。在我们的首次临床经验中,CoolSeal 用于全甲状腺切除术是安全有效的。由于样本量较小,我们看到了手术时间缩短而无术后并发症增加的临床获益。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of CoolSeal - a new, safe, and fast vessel sealing device in total thyroidectomy.在全甲状腺切除术应用 CoolSeal 新的安全快速血管闭合系统的临床评估。
Endocr Regul. 2024 Oct 1;58(1):181-186. doi: 10.2478/enr-2024-0021. Print 2024 Jan 1.
2
LigaSure vs clamp-and-tie technique to achieve hemostasis in total thyroidectomy for benign multinodular goiter: a prospective randomized study.LigaSure与钳夹结扎技术在良性结节性甲状腺肿全甲状腺切除术中实现止血的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 2007 Feb;142(2):150-6; discussion 157. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.2.150.
3
Thyroid surgery: use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System versus conventional knot tying.甲状腺手术:LigaSure血管闭合系统与传统打结法的应用对比
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 May 23.
4
A safety-based comparison of pure LigaSure use and LigaSure-tie technique in total thyroidectomy.在全甲状腺切除术中基于安全性的单纯使用LigaSure与LigaSure打结技术的比较。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014 Jan-Feb;109(1):60-5.
5
Use of the electrothermal vessel sealing system versus standard vessel ligation in thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术中电热血管封闭系统与标准血管结扎术的应用比较
Asian J Surg. 2005 Apr;28(2):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60268-2.
6
Comparison of Surgical Complications Rates Between LigaSure Small Jaw and Clamp-and-Tie Hemostatic Technique in 1,000 Neuro-Monitored Thyroidectomies.1000 例神经监测下甲状腺切除术 LigaSure 小咬口与夹-绑止血技术的手术并发症发生率比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 7;12:638608. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.638608. eCollection 2021.
7
Ligasure vessel sealing system versus conventional vessel ligation in thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术中Ligasure血管闭合系统与传统血管结扎术的比较
Scand J Surg. 2007;96(1):31-4. doi: 10.1177/145749690709600106.
8
Comparing postoperative complication of LigaSure Small Jaw instrument with clamp and tie method in thyroidectomy patients: a randomized controlled trial [IRCT2014010516077N1].比较 LigaSure 小咬骨器械与钳夹结扎法在甲状腺切除术患者中的术后并发症:一项随机对照试验 [IRCT2014010516077N1]。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep 21;16(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1448-9.
9
New technique using an energy-based device versus conventional technique in open thyroidectomy.开放性甲状腺切除术中使用基于能量的设备的新技术与传统技术的比较
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Dec;40(6):558-62. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
10
Bipolar thermofusion vessel sealing system (TVS) versus conventional vessel ligation (CVL) in thyroid surgery--results of a prospective study.双极热融合血管密封系统(TVS)与甲状腺手术中传统血管结扎(CVL)的比较——一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Feb;395(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0571-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of the CoolSeal Reveal in thyroid surgery.CoolSeal Reveal在甲状腺手术中的对比结果。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02295-x.