• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线——个体参与者数据和汇总数据的系统评价与Meta分析

Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.

作者信息

Koh Chan Hee, Booker James, Choi David, Khan Danyal Zaman, Layard Horsfall Hugo, Sayal Parag, Marcus Hani J, Prezerakos George

机构信息

Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Neurosciences Department, Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1435-1444. doi: 10.1177/21925682241289901. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1177/21925682241289901
PMID:39352790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11559801/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data.

OBJECTIVES

To define the learning curves of endoscopic discectomies using unified statistical methodologies.

METHODS

Searches returned 913 records, with 118 full-text articles screened. Studies of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery reporting outcomes by case order were included. Mixed-effects nonlinear, logistic, and beta meta-regressions prdwere conducted to define the learning curves.

RESULTS

13 studies involving 864 patients among 15 surgeons were included in total. For transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, the estimated operating time for the first case was 95 min [CI: 87-104], and the estimated plateau was 66 minutes [CI: 51-81]. An estimated 21 cases [CI: 18-25] were required to overcome 80% of this deficit, but near-plateau performance was expected only after 59 cases [CI: 51-70]. The estimated risk of surgical complications on the first case was 25% [CI: 11%-46%], with an 80% reduction in relative risk requiring an estimated 41 cases. The expected postoperative VAS leg pain score after the first case was 2.7 [CI: 1.8-3.8], with an 80% improvement requiring an estimated 96 cases. Similar numbers were required to overcome the learning curves in interlaminar and biportal endoscopic discectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 60 cases are required to achieve proficiency in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery, although the greatest part of the learning curve can be overcome with 20 cases. This should be considered when designing implementation programmes for surgeons and service providers that wish to incorporate endoscopic spinal surgery into their practice.

摘要

研究设计

对个体参与者数据和汇总数据进行系统评价与荟萃分析。

目的

采用统一的统计方法确定内镜下椎间盘切除术的学习曲线。

方法

检索得到913条记录,筛选出118篇全文文章。纳入按病例顺序报告结果的内镜下腰椎手术研究。进行混合效应非线性、逻辑和β荟萃回归以确定学习曲线。

结果

总共纳入了13项研究,涉及15位外科医生的864例患者。对于经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术,第一例手术的估计操作时间为95分钟[可信区间:87 - 104],估计平稳期为66分钟[可信区间:51 - 81]。估计需要21例[可信区间:18 - 25]来克服这一差距的80%,但预计仅在59例[可信区间:51 - 70]后达到接近平稳期的表现。第一例手术的估计手术并发症风险为25%[可信区间:11% - 46%],相对风险降低80%估计需要41例。第一例手术后预期的术后腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)为2.7[可信区间:1.8 - 3.8],改善80%估计需要96例。在椎板间和双门内镜下椎间盘切除术中克服学习曲线所需的病例数相似。

结论

在内镜下腰椎手术中,达到熟练程度大约需要60例,不过20例可克服学习曲线的大部分。对于希望将内镜脊柱手术纳入其业务的外科医生和服务提供者,在设计实施计划时应考虑这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/282708cac605/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/8be7edfa7a67/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/2fb41aaaddbd/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/282708cac605/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/8be7edfa7a67/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/2fb41aaaddbd/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9066/11877494/282708cac605/10.1177_21925682241289901-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线——个体参与者数据和汇总数据的系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1435-1444. doi: 10.1177/21925682241289901. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of learning curves.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术与单侧双孔道内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:学习曲线的比较分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2154-2165. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08293-8. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: Learning curve analysis with CUSUM analysis and clinical outcomes.单侧双孔道内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:运用累积和分析的学习曲线分析及临床疗效
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;249:108755. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108755. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
The learning curve for lumbar discectomy in unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using the cumulative summation method.采用累积求和法的单侧双孔道内镜脊柱手术中腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 2;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05763-7.
6
Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy with Other Surgical Technics: A Systemic Review of Indications and Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy from the Current Literature.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与其他手术技术的比较:当前文献中单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术适应证和疗效的系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:349-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.153.
7
Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Approach of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.局麻下单侧入路椎间孔镜与椎板间入路内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5/S1 椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究
Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):E1191-E1198.
8
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Unique Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术和经皮内窥镜下椎间孔入路腰椎间盘切除术的独特并发症。
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E105-E112.
10
A Pilot Study of Full-Endoscopic Annulus Fibrosus Suture Following Lumbar Discectomy: Technique Notes and One-Year Follow-Up.腰椎间盘切除术后全内镜纤维环缝合的初步研究:技术要点和一年随访。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):E497-E506.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial Experience of Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy in a Single Orthopedics Unit.单一骨科单元经椎间孔腰椎内镜下椎间盘切除术的初步经验
Cureus. 2025 Sep 4;17(9):e91589. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91589. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Classification of endoscopic spine procedures.脊柱内镜手术的分类
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Mar 11;22:100603. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100603. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Editorial to Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.《微创脊柱外科进展》编辑社论

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Curve for Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜经鼻蝶窦手术学习曲线:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Comparison of biportal endoscopic technique and uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decomprssion (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧减压单侧入路内镜下腰椎间孔切开术与单通道内镜下腰椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Uniportal versus biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive review.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 1;13(21):6569. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216569.
单通道与双通道内窥镜脊柱手术:全面综述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul;20(7):549-556. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2214678. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜和机器人全胃切除术的学习曲线:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Today. 2024 Jun;54(6):509-522. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02672-2. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
The learning curve of the robotic-assisted lobectomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助肺叶切除术的学习曲线——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jan 31;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.21037/acs-2022-urats-14. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
6
Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2453-2475. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09760-3. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
7
Learning curve for esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下食管肌切开术的学习曲线:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Endoscopy. 2023 Apr;55(4):355-360. doi: 10.1055/a-1935-1093. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Learning Curve and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy: Cumulative Sum and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum Analysis.单侧双孔道内镜检查的学习曲线及并发症:累积和与风险调整累积和分析
Neurospine. 2022 Sep;19(3):792-804. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143116.558. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
9
Learning curve and volume outcome relationship of endoscopic trans-oral versus trans-axillary thyroidectomy; A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口与经腋入路内镜甲状腺切除术学习曲线与手术量关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106739. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106739. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
10
The Learning Curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) Spinal Surgery by CUSUM Analysis.通过累积和分析评估单侧双通道内镜(UBE)脊柱手术的学习曲线
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 29;9:873691. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.873691. eCollection 2022.