Suppr超能文献

超声引导下肩胛上神经阻滞与关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗冻结肩的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Blocks and Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injections for Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):415-424.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current mainstream treatment for frozen shoulder is a combination of physiotherapy and intraarticular corticosteroid injections (IACIs). Recently, the ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has developed as a notable alternative option to the mainstream treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare ultrasound-guided SSNBs' effectiveness to IACIs' as treatments for frozen shoulder.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was conducted as a prospective single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

Patients with frozen shoulder (n = 76) were enrolled as participants and allocated to either an SSNB group (n = 38) or an IACI group (n = 38). Both groups received 2 injections of 20 mg of triamcinolone and 3 mL of 1% lidocaine at 2-week intervals and underwent the same physiotherapy protocol for 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The secondary outcome measures were the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), the active and passive range of motion (ROM) of each patient's affected shoulder, and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment.

RESULTS

Both groups achieved significant improvements in all outcome measures, except the general health subscale of the SF-36 at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment. For time and group interaction, the results for the SDQ (P = .047) and SF-36 (bodily pain, P = .025) indicated significant differences that favored IACIs. Additionally, the IACI group achieved more favorable outcomes than did the SSNB group on the SPADI (P = .094) and in ROM (i.e., abduction [P = .190] and external rotation [P = .081]) as well as on 2 subscales of the SF-36: bodily pain (P = .059) and role-emotional (P = .072).

LIMITATIONS

Our study is limited by the lack of participant stratification based on the stages of frozen shoulder and the 12-week follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of ultrasound-guided IACIs and physiotherapy should be attempted first as a frozen shoulder treatment.

摘要

背景

目前,治疗冻结肩的主流方法是物理疗法结合关节内皮质类固醇注射(IACI)。最近,超声引导肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)已成为主流治疗方法的一种显著替代选择。

目的

我们旨在比较超声引导 SSNB 与 IACI 治疗冻结肩的效果。

研究设计

这是一项前瞻性单盲、随机对照试验。

设置

台北信义区新光吴火狮纪念医院物理医学与康复部,一所医疗中心。

方法

将 76 名冻结肩患者纳入研究并随机分为 SSNB 组(n=38)或 IACI 组(n=38)。两组均在 2 周间隔内接受 2 次 20 mg 曲安奈德和 3 mL 1%利多卡因注射,并接受相同的物理治疗方案 3 个月。主要结局指标是肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)。次要结局指标包括肩残障问卷(SDQ)、每位患者患侧肩关节的主动和被动活动范围(ROM)以及 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)。在基线和治疗开始后 4 周和 12 周进行评估。

结果

两组患者在所有结局指标上均有显著改善,除治疗开始后 4 周和 12 周的 SF-36 一般健康状况亚量表外。在时间和组间交互作用方面,SDQ(P=.047)和 SF-36(躯体疼痛,P=.025)的结果表明 IACI 更具优势。此外,与 SSNB 组相比,IACI 组在 SPADI(P=.094)和 ROM(即外展[P=.190]和外旋[P=.081])以及 SF-36 的 2 个亚量表(躯体疼痛[P=.059]和角色情感[P=.072])上的结果更优。

局限性

本研究的局限性在于缺乏基于冻结肩分期和 12 周随访期的参与者分层。

结论

作为冻结肩的治疗方法,应首先尝试联合使用超声引导 IACI 和物理疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验