Health and Biological Sciences Department, Federal University of Amapa, Macapa, Brazil.
Evidence-Based Health Program, Unifesp EPM, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e087778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087778.
Physiotherapists provide non-pharmacological conservative treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) using a wide spectrum of interventions. Previous surveys have identified global physiotherapy OA management practices. However, no review to date summarises the scope and findings of these studies. This article describes a scoping review protocol to map the surveys investigating physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA to identify the treatment interventions currently used for OA, the physiotherapists' attributes and organisational practice factors potentially associated with the choice of these interventions and to detect knowledge-practice gaps in the provision of physiotherapeutic interventions in OA treatment, contributing to guiding future research on this topic.
This is a protocol for a scoping review that will be based on Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology and the methodological guidance for conducting scoping reviews published by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Relevant articles will be searched using the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Surveys studies addressing physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA will be included. Study will be selected through title/abstract and full-text screening stages and data will be extracted using an instrument based on the model available in the JBI Manual. The findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics according to our research questions. This review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews.
Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. Review findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations and scientific meetings.
This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/J3RBT).
物理治疗师使用广泛的干预措施为骨关节炎(OA)提供非药物保守治疗。以前的调查已经确定了全球物理治疗师 OA 管理实践。然而,迄今为止,没有审查总结这些研究的范围和结果。本文描述了一个范围审查方案,以绘制调查骨关节炎患者提供的物理治疗干预措施的调查,以确定目前用于 OA 的治疗干预措施、与选择这些干预措施相关的物理治疗师的特征和组织实践因素,并发现 OA 治疗中物理治疗干预提供方面的知识-实践差距,有助于指导该主题的未来研究。
这是一个范围审查的方案,该方案将基于 Arksey 和 O'Malley 范围审查方法和 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)发布的进行范围审查的方法学指南。将使用以下数据库搜索相关文章:Medline(PubMed)、Embase、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。将包括针对 OA 患者提供的物理治疗干预措施的调查研究。研究将通过标题/摘要和全文筛选阶段进行选择,并使用基于 JBI 手册中提供的模型的工具提取数据。根据我们的研究问题,使用描述性统计总结研究结果。本综述将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选项目进行报告,用于范围审查。
本范围审查不需要伦理批准。审查结果将通过同行评议出版物、科学会议演讲和科学会议传播。
本方案已在开放科学框架(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/J3RBT)中注册。