Mannes Zachary L, Nowels Molly, Mauro Christine, Cook Sharon, Wheeler-Martin Katherine, Gutkind Sarah, Bruzelius Emilie, Doonan Samantha M, Crystal Stephen, Davis Corey S, Samples Hillary, Hasin Deborah S, Keyes Katherine M, Rudolph Kara E, Cerdá Magdalena, Martins Silvia S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1030-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09053-6. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
U.S. state electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are associated with reduced opioid dispensing among people with chronic pain and may impact use of other chronic pain treatments. In states with medical cannabis laws (MCLs), patients can use cannabis for chronic pain management, reducing their need for chronic-pain related treatment visits and moderating effects of PDMP laws.
Given high rates of chronic pain among Medicaid enrollees, we examined associations between PDMP enactment in the presence or absence of MCL on chronic pain-related outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits.
We created annual cohorts of Medicaid enrollees with chronic pain diagnoses using national Medicaid claims data from 2002-2013 and 2016. Negative binomial hurdle models produced adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for the likelihood of any chronic pain-related outpatient or ED visit and incident rate ratios (IRR) for the rate of visits among patients with ≥ 1 visit.
Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 years with chronic pain (N = 4,878,462).
A 3-level state-year variable with the following categories: 1) no PDMP, 2) PDMP enactment in the absence of MCL, or 3) PDMP enactment in the presence of MCL. Healthcare codes for chronic pain-related outpatient and ED visits each year.
The sample was primarily female (67.2%), non-Hispanic White (51.2%), and ages 40-55 years (37.2%). Compared to no-PDMP states, PDMP enactment in the absence of MCL was not associated with chronic pain-related outpatient visits but PDMP enactment in the presence of MCL was associated with lower odds of chronic pain-related outpatient visits (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI:0.71-0.92). PDMP enactment was not associated with ED visits, irrespective of MCL.
During a period of PDMP and MCL expansion, our findings suggest treatment shifts for persons with chronic pain away from outpatient settings, potentially related to increased use of cannabis for chronic pain management.
美国各州的电子处方药物监测计划(PDMPs)与慢性疼痛患者的阿片类药物配给量减少有关,并且可能会影响其他慢性疼痛治疗方法的使用。在有医用大麻法律(MCLs)的州,患者可以使用大麻来管理慢性疼痛,从而减少他们对与慢性疼痛相关的就诊需求,并缓和PDMP法律的影响。
鉴于医疗补助计划参保者中慢性疼痛的高发病率,我们研究了在有或没有MCL的情况下,PDMP的颁布与慢性疼痛相关的门诊和急诊科(ED)就诊之间的关联。
我们使用2002年至2013年以及2016年的全国医疗补助计划索赔数据,创建了患有慢性疼痛诊断的医疗补助计划参保者的年度队列。负二项式障碍模型得出了任何与慢性疼痛相关的门诊或ED就诊可能性的调整优势比(aOR),以及≥1次就诊患者的就诊率的发病率比(IRR)。
年龄在18 - 64岁之间患有慢性疼痛的医疗补助计划参保者(N = 4,878,462)。
一个三级州年度变量,分为以下几类:1)无PDMP,2)在没有MCL的情况下颁布PDMP,或3)在有MCL的情况下颁布PDMP。每年与慢性疼痛相关的门诊和ED就诊的医疗代码。
样本主要为女性(67.2%)、非西班牙裔白人(51.2%),年龄在40 - 55岁之间(37.2%)。与无PDMP的州相比,在没有MCL的情况下颁布PDMP与慢性疼痛相关的门诊就诊无关,但在有MCL的情况下颁布PDMP与慢性疼痛相关的门诊就诊几率较低有关(aOR = 0.81,95% CI:0.71 - 0.92)。无论有无MCL,PDMP的颁布与ED就诊均无关。
在PDMP和MCL扩展期间,我们的研究结果表明,慢性疼痛患者的治疗方式从门诊转向其他方式,这可能与大麻用于慢性疼痛管理的使用增加有关。