• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿形成的危险因素及临床影响:一项回顾性研究

Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Xie Hong-Yang, Chen Bin, Shen Jie, Wang Yi-Ping, Shen Wei-Cai, Dai Chun-Shan

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ningbo Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315016, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1
PMID:39354429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11443785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has advantages over open surgery, postoperative seroma formation remains an issue. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of seroma formation in patients undergoing LIHR.

METHODS

From January 2016 to March 2023, clinical data of patients who underwent LIHR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who developed seroma and those who did not were classified into the seroma and non-seroma groups, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for variables of interest. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk factors of the binary logistic model, and the cutoff value for each risk factor was obtained.

RESULTS

Data of 128 patients were evaluated. Compared with patients in the non-seroma group, those in the seroma group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), more direct hernias (P < 0.001), larger hernial orifice size (P < 0.001), more laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) (P < 0.001), more frequent reduction of hernial sac (P = 0.011), and lower preoperative serum albumin level (PSAL) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed on these variables showed that high BMI (P = 0.005), large hernial orifice (P = 0.001), TEP (P = 0.033), and low PSAL (P = 0.009) were risk factors for seroma formation. Compared with the non-seroma group, the seroma group exhibited a higher numerical rating scale score for postoperative pain (P < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

BMI (> 24.5 kg/m), hernial orifice size (> 2.5 cm), TEP, and PSAL (< 32.5 g/L) were independent risk factors of postoperative seroma formation in patients who underwent LIHR. Although most seromas resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention, seroma formation results in increased patient pain and prolonged hospital stay.

摘要

背景

尽管腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)相较于开放手术具有优势,但术后血清肿形成仍是一个问题。本研究旨在调查接受LIHR患者血清肿形成的危险因素及临床结局。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年3月期间接受LIHR患者的临床资料。发生血清肿的患者和未发生血清肿的患者分别被纳入血清肿组和非血清肿组。比较两组的人口统计学和临床特征。对感兴趣的变量进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析。采用受试者工作特征曲线评估二元逻辑模型的危险因素,并获得各危险因素的截断值。

结果

评估了128例患者的数据。与非血清肿组患者相比,血清肿组患者的体重指数(BMI)更高(P<0.001),直疝更多(P<0.001),疝孔尺寸更大(P<0.001),腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)更多(P<0.001),疝囊还纳更频繁(P=0.011),术前血清白蛋白水平(PSAL)更低(P<0.001)。对这些变量进行的多因素逻辑回归分析表明,高BMI(P=0.005)、大疝孔(P=0.001)、TEP(P=0.033)和低PSAL(P=0.009)是血清肿形成的危险因素。与非血清肿组相比,血清肿组术后疼痛的数字评定量表评分更高(P<0.001),住院时间更长(P=0.032)。

结论

BMI(>24.5kg/m²)、疝孔尺寸(>2.5cm)、TEP和PSAL(<32.5g/L)是接受LIHR患者术后血清肿形成的独立危险因素。尽管大多数血清肿无需手术干预即可自行消退,但血清肿形成会导致患者疼痛加剧和住院时间延长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/11443785/08bda9f19b8b/12893_2024_2574_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/11443785/0903a9e67634/12893_2024_2574_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/11443785/08bda9f19b8b/12893_2024_2574_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/11443785/0903a9e67634/12893_2024_2574_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/11443785/08bda9f19b8b/12893_2024_2574_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿形成的危险因素及临床影响:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1.
2
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:三级转诊中心 TEP 和 TAPP 手术的回顾性比较。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1.
3
Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study.腹腔镜横断间接腹股沟疝囊与术后血清肿形成的相关性:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1147-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6374-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Differences in the rates of seroma complications between hernial sac transection and reduction after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后疝囊横断与还纳的血清肿并发症发生率差异:系统评价与荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 23;15(1):10030. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94683-x.
5
Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial.完全腹膜外疝修补术后腹膜前封闭系统吸引引流预防早期血清肿形成:一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验
Hernia. 2018 Jun;22(3):455-465. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1731-2. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
6
Little influence of the abandoned sac on seroma formation following laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of lateral inguinal hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补外侧腹股沟疝后,废弃疝囊对血清肿形成影响较小。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1740-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11523-1. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
7
Effect of complete reduction of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair on seroma.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中完全切除疝囊和横断疝囊对血清肿的影响。
BMC Surg. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01599-8.
8
Navigating hernia sac management in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: to abandon or to reduce? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.微创腹股沟疝修补术中疝囊处理的抉择:摒弃还是回纳?一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7045-7054. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11323-7. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
9
A randomized study on laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with hernia sac transection vs complete sac reduction.一项关于腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术联合疝囊横断 vs 完整囊内复位的随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1882-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07303-x. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
10
Intraoperative adjunctive techniques to reduce seroma formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a systematic review.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中减少血清肿形成的术中辅助技术:一项系统评价
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):723-731. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01903-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative lymphatic leakage following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: the first case report and review of the literature.腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后的淋巴漏:首例病例报告及文献复习
Hernia. 2025 Mar 27;29(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03318-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术:一项对比研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 10;15(11):e48619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48619. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Local Anaesthetic Inguinal Hernia Repair.体重指数对局部麻醉腹股沟疝修补术的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36163. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36163. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Preoperative Serum Albumin Level as a Predictor of Abdominal Wound-Related Complications After Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy.
术前血清白蛋白水平作为急诊剖腹探查术后腹部伤口相关并发症的预测指标
Cureus. 2022 Nov 28;14(11):e31980. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31980. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Does closure of the direct hernia defect in laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy reduce the risk of recurrence and seroma formation?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中直接疝缺损的闭合是否降低复发和血清肿形成的风险?:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):259-264. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02724-5. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
5
Obesity and Complication Risk From Radical Cystectomy: Identifying a Body Mass Index Threshold.肥胖与根治性膀胱切除术的并发症风险:确定体重指数阈值
J Urol. 2023 Jan;209(1):111-120. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002988. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein tension-free open mesh inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study.腹腔镜全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术与李金斯坦无张力开放网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术效果比较:前瞻性随机研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 1;101(26):e29746. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029746.
7
Clinical Experience with Compression Taping to Treat Seroma After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Medical Device Clinical Study.乳腺癌手术后使用压缩贴带来治疗血清肿的临床经验:医疗器械临床研究。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Jul 1;35(7):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000831068.34587.3d.
8
Association between preoperative serum albumin levels with risk of death and postoperative complications after bariatric surgery: a retrospective cohort study.术前血清白蛋白水平与减重手术后死亡和术后并发症风险的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jul;18(7):928-934. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
9
Effect of complete reduction of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair on seroma.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中完全切除疝囊和横断疝囊对血清肿的影响。
BMC Surg. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01599-8.
10
Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.腹股沟疝开放修补术与腹腔镜修补术:随机对照试验系统评价概述
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4685-4700. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6. Epub 2022 Mar 14.