Olugbemi Mojolaoluwa, Athisayaraj Thomas, Lorejo Emmanuel, Coveney Eamonn
General Surgery/Colorectal Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, GBR.
General Surgery/Breast Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, GBR.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36163. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36163. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is acceptable and can be performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Individuals with high BMI (Body Mass Index) have often been excluded from LA repairs for varying reasons including safety concerns. Open repair of unilateral inguinal hernia (UIH) amongst individuals with different BMI groups was studied. Its safety profile was investigated using LA volume and length of operation (LO) as endpoints. Operative pain and patient satisfaction were also evaluated.
A total of 438 adult patients were studied having excluded underweight patients, those requiring any additional intra-operative analgesia, multiple procedures, or records with incomplete data. Operative pain, patient satisfaction, LO and LA volume were retrospectively studied from the existing data from clinical and operative notes.
It was a predominantly male population (93.2% males) with an age range of 17-94 years peaking in the 60-69 years age group. BMI ranged 19-39 kg/m with BMI above normal at 62.8%. LO was 13-100 minutes (average 37 mins {SD = 12}) utilising an average LA volume of 45 ml (SD = 11) per patient. Across BMI groups, no significant difference in LO (P = 0.168) or patient satisfaction (P = 0.388) was seen. Although LA volume (P = 0.011) and pain score (P<0.001) demonstrated statistically significant differences, these did not appear to be clinically relevant. Over 90% in each BMI group experienced mild or no pain and with severe pain reported in only one patient in the entire population. Overall, LA volume required per patient was low and dosage was safe in all BMI groups with significant proportion (89%) of patients evaluated for satisfaction rating their experience ≥ 90 out of 100.
LA repair is safe and well tolerated irrespective of BMI. BMI is not a viable reason for exclusion of obese/overweight individuals from LA repair.
腹股沟疝开放网片修补术是可行的,且可在局部麻醉(LA)下进行。由于包括安全担忧在内的各种原因,高体重指数(BMI)个体常被排除在局部麻醉修补术之外。本研究针对不同BMI组个体的单侧腹股沟疝(UIH)开放修补术展开。以局部麻醉用量和手术时长(LO)为观察指标,对其安全性进行了研究。同时还评估了手术疼痛情况和患者满意度。
共纳入438例成年患者,排除了体重过轻患者、需要任何额外术中镇痛的患者、接受多项手术的患者或数据不完整的记录。通过临床和手术记录中的现有数据,对手术疼痛、患者满意度、手术时长和局部麻醉用量进行回顾性研究。
研究对象以男性为主(93.2%为男性),年龄范围为17 - 94岁,60 - 年龄组人数最多。BMI范围为19 - 39 kg/m²,62.8%的患者BMI高于正常水平。手术时长为13 - 100分钟(平均37分钟{标准差 = 12}),每位患者平均局部麻醉用量为45毫升(标准差 = 11)。在不同BMI组中,手术时长(P = 0.168)或患者满意度(P = 0.388)未见显著差异。尽管局部麻醉用量(P = 0.011)和疼痛评分(P<0.001)显示出统计学上的显著差异,但这些差异似乎并无临床相关性。每个BMI组中超过90%的患者经历轻度疼痛或无疼痛,整个研究人群中仅有1例患者报告有重度疼痛。总体而言,所有BMI组中每位患者所需的局部麻醉用量较低且剂量安全,89%接受满意度评估的患者将其体验评为100分中的90分及以上。
无论BMI如何,局部麻醉修补术都是安全且耐受性良好的。BMI并非将肥胖/超重个体排除在局部麻醉修补术之外的合理理由。