Haddad Roula, Dagenais Christian, Fallu Jean-Sébastien, Huỳnh Christophe, D'Arcy Laurence, Hot Aurélie
Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
School of Psychoeducation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Oct 1;21(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01093-9.
Cannabis use can generate potential avoidable harms, hence the need for effective preventive measures and treatment. Studies show the efficacy of harm reduction (HR) in minimizing undesirable consequences associated with this use. Despite its proven efficacy, HR in cannabis use remains poorly applied by many health and social services (HSS) practitioners, especially with young people. However, knowledge regarding the underlying reasons for this is limited. To fill this gap, we aimed to identify facilitators of and obstacles to HSS practitioners' adoption of HR in cannabis use across OECD countries.
We conducted a scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's model. The search strategy, executed on health databases and in the grey literature, captured 1804 studies, of which 35 were retained. Data from these studies were extracted in summary sheets for qualitative and numerical analysis.
Facilitators and obstacles were grouped into four themes: stakeholders' characteristics (e.g., education, practice experience); clients' characteristics (e.g., personal, medical); factors related to HR (e.g., perceived efficacy, misconceptions); factors related to the workplace (e.g., type of workplace). Data were also extracted to describe the populations recruited in the selected studies: type of population, clientele, workplace.
Several factors might facilitate or hinder HSS practitioners' adoption of HR in cannabis use. Taking these into consideration when translating knowledge about HR can improve its acceptability and applicability. Future research and action should focus on this when addressing practitioners' adoption of HR.
使用大麻会产生潜在的可避免危害,因此需要有效的预防措施和治疗方法。研究表明,减少危害(HR)在将与这种使用相关的不良后果降至最低方面具有有效性。尽管已证实其有效性,但许多卫生和社会服务(HSS)从业者,尤其是在与年轻人打交道时,对大麻使用的减少危害措施应用得仍然很差。然而,关于其根本原因的了解有限。为了填补这一空白,我们旨在确定经合组织国家卫生和社会服务从业者采用大麻使用减少危害措施的促进因素和障碍。
我们在阿克西和奥马利模型的指导下进行了一项范围综述。在健康数据库和灰色文献中执行的搜索策略共检索到1804项研究,其中35项被保留。从这些研究中提取的数据记录在汇总表中,用于定性和定量分析。
促进因素和障碍分为四个主题:利益相关者特征(如教育程度、实践经验);客户特征(如个人情况、医疗状况);与减少危害相关的因素(如感知到的有效性、误解);与工作场所相关的因素(如工作场所类型)。还提取了数据以描述所选研究中招募的人群:人群类型、客户群体、工作场所。
若干因素可能促进或阻碍卫生和社会服务从业者采用大麻使用减少危害措施。在转化关于减少危害的知识时考虑这些因素,可以提高其可接受性和适用性。未来在研究从业者对减少危害措施的采用情况时,应关注这一点。