Suppr超能文献

对南非茨瓦内地区卫生服务中对“二次受害者”的支持情况的评估。

An evaluation of support to the second victims in Tshwane District Health Services, South Africa.

作者信息

Nzaumvila Doudou K, Bongongo Tombo, Govender Indiran, Okeke Sunday O

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine & Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria.

出版信息

S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2024 Sep 26;66(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/safp.v66i1.5980.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initiatives to reduce patient safety incidents (PSI) and support healthcare professionals who may experience psychological trauma as a result are becoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the quality of the support provided by Tshwane District Health Services. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their assistance for the second victims in order to evaluate their effectiveness.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 319 healthcare professionals from six primary health care institutions were invited to participate in the study. The sociodemographic information, work experience, emotional support, familiarity with the concept of the 'second victim' and involvement with PSIs were collected.

RESULTS

The mean age was 39.8 years, ranging from 22 years to 66 years. The majority of participants were females (n = 249; 78.1%), nurses (n = 153; 49.2%), and those with 5-9 years of experience (n = 82; 25.8%). Most participants (n = 168; 52.7%) were aware of the possibilities of emotional support, while less than half (n = 142; 44.5%) were familiar with the term 'second victim'. The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the institutions was 19.4%, and the majority of second victims (n = 39; 62.9%) emotionally felt the need to speak with someone about it, preferably outside of the workplace. Less than 5% of individuals received support that was initiated by existing structures at their workplace.

CONCLUSION

Frameworks exist to assist second victims, although they are only known to some healthcare professionals. However, their current use in Tshwane health facilities is ineffective. After experiencing PSIs, second victims often rely on psychological assistance outside of the workplace.Contribution: Authorities need to determine the causes behind some healthcare professionals' lack of awareness regarding the support framework for second victims, as well as their growing tendency to rely on psychologists outside of the workplace, and corrective measures should be implemented.

摘要

背景

减少患者安全事件(PSI)并为可能因此遭受心理创伤的医护人员提供支持的举措正变得越来越普遍。然而,对于茨瓦内地区卫生服务机构所提供支持的质量却知之甚少。因此,有必要评估他们对“第二受害者”的援助,以评估其有效性。

方法

开展了一项横断面研究,邀请了来自六个初级卫生保健机构的319名医护人员参与研究。收集了社会人口学信息、工作经验、情感支持、对“第二受害者”概念的熟悉程度以及与患者安全事件的关联情况。

结果

平均年龄为39.8岁,年龄范围在22岁至66岁之间。大多数参与者为女性(n = 249;78.1%)、护士(n = 153;49.2%)以及有5至9年工作经验的人员(n = 82;25.8%)。大多数参与者(n = 168;52.7%)知晓获得情感支持的可能性,而不到一半的人(n = 142;44.5%)熟悉“第二受害者”这一术语。各机构中不良事件的累积发生率为19.4%,大多数“第二受害者”(n = 39;62.9%)在情感上觉得有必要就此事与他人倾诉,最好是在工作场所以外。不到5%的人获得了由其工作场所现有架构发起的支持。

结论

存在帮助“第二受害者”的框架,尽管只有部分医护人员知晓。然而,它们目前在茨瓦内卫生设施中的使用效果不佳。经历患者安全事件后,“第二受害者”往往依赖工作场所以外的心理援助。贡献:当局需要确定一些医护人员对“第二受害者”支持框架缺乏认识以及他们越来越倾向于依赖工作场所以外的心理学家的背后原因,并应采取纠正措施。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Second victims in health care: current perspectives.医疗领域的“二次受害者”:当前观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 12;10:593-603. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S185912. eCollection 2019.
10
Abandon the term "second victim".摒弃“第二受害者”这一术语。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 27;364:l1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1233.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验