• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过双标记延迟动脉自旋标记成像评估单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者的脑灌注情况。

Cerebral perfusion in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion by dual post-labeling delays arterial spin labeling imaging.

作者信息

Zhang Gui-Rong, Zhang Yan-Yan, Liang Wen-Bin, Ding Dun

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710043, Shaanxi Province, China.

出版信息

World J Radiol. 2024 Sep 28;16(9):429-438. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i9.429.

DOI:10.4329/wjr.v16.i9.429
PMID:39355390
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Global and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) are unclear when the dual post-labeling delays (PLD) arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is used. Manual delineation of regions of interest for CBF measurement is time-consuming and laborious.

AIM

To assess global and regional CBF changes in patients with unilateral ICAO with the ASL-MRI perfusion technique.

METHODS

Twenty hospitalized patients with ICAO and sex- and age-matched controls were included in the study. Regional CBF was measured by Dr. Brain's ASL software. The present study evaluated differences in global, middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, anterior cerebral artery territory, and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) regions (including the caudate nucleus, lentiform nucleus, insula ribbon, internal capsule, and M1-M6) and brain lobes (including frontal, parietal, temporal, and insular lobes) between ICAO patients and controls at PLD 1.5 s and PLD 2.5 s.

RESULTS

When comparing CBF between ICAO patients and controls, the global CBF in ICAO patients was lower at both PLD 1.5 s and PLD 2.5 s; the CBF on the occluded side was lower in 15 brain regions at PLD 1.5 s, and it was lower in 9 brain regions at PLD 2.5 s; the CBF in the contralateral hemisphere was lower in the caudate nucleus and internal capsule at PLD 1.5 s and in M6 at PLD 2.5 s. The global CBF in ICAO patients was lower at PLD 1.5 s than at PLD 2.5 s. The ipsilateral CBF at PLD 1.5 s was lower than that at PLD 2.5 s in 15 regions, whereas the contralateral CBF was lower at PLD 1.5 s than at PLD 2.5 s in 12 regions. The ipsilateral CBF was lower than the contralateral CBF in 15 regions at PLD 1.5 s, and in M6 at PLD 2.5 s.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral ICAO results in hypoperfusion in the global and MCA territories, especially in the ASPECTS area. Dual PLD settings prove more suitable for accurate CBF quantification in ICAO.

摘要

背景

在使用双标记延迟(PLD)动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振成像(MRI)技术时,单侧颈内动脉闭塞(ICAO)患者的全脑和局部脑血流量(CBF)变化尚不清楚。手动勾勒用于测量CBF的感兴趣区域既耗时又费力。

目的

采用ASL-MRI灌注技术评估单侧ICAO患者的全脑和局部CBF变化。

方法

本研究纳入了20例住院的ICAO患者以及性别和年龄匹配的对照组。采用Dr. Brain的ASL软件测量局部CBF。本研究评估了在PLD为1.5秒和2.5秒时,ICAO患者与对照组之间在全脑、大脑中动脉(MCA)供血区、大脑前动脉供血区以及阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期CT评分(ASPECTS)区域(包括尾状核、豆状核、岛叶带、内囊和M1-M6)和脑叶(包括额叶、顶叶、颞叶和岛叶)的差异。

结果

比较ICAO患者与对照组的CBF时,ICAO患者在PLD 1.5秒和PLD 2.5秒时的全脑CBF均较低;在PLD 1.5秒时,闭塞侧的CBF在15个脑区较低,在PLD 2.5秒时,在9个脑区较低;在PLD 1.5秒时,对侧半球的尾状核和内囊以及在PLD 2.5秒时的M6区域CBF较低。ICAO患者在PLD 1.5秒时的全脑CBF低于PLD 2.5秒时。在15个区域中,PLD 1.5秒时患侧的CBF低于PLD 2.5秒时,而在12个区域中,PLD 1.5秒时对侧的CBF低于PLD 2.5秒时。在PLD 1.5秒时,15个区域患侧的CBF低于对侧,在PLD 2.5秒时M6区域患侧的CBF低于对侧。

结论

单侧ICAO导致全脑和MCA供血区灌注不足,尤其是在ASPECTS区域。双PLD设置更适合于准确量化ICAO患者的CBF。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/11440276/b03b75a7351b/WJR-16-429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/11440276/0933ef56afef/WJR-16-429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/11440276/b03b75a7351b/WJR-16-429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/11440276/0933ef56afef/WJR-16-429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/11440276/b03b75a7351b/WJR-16-429-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral perfusion in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion by dual post-labeling delays arterial spin labeling imaging.通过双标记延迟动脉自旋标记成像评估单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者的脑灌注情况。
World J Radiol. 2024 Sep 28;16(9):429-438. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i9.429.
2
The effect of post-labeling delay on cerebral blood flow is influenced by age and sex: a study based on arterial spin-labeling magnetic resonance imaging.标记后延迟对脑血流的影响受年龄和性别的影响:一项基于动脉自旋标记磁共振成像的研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):4388-4402. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1622. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in children and young adults with previous ischemic stroke and unilateral intracranial arteriopathy.针对既往有缺血性卒中及单侧颅内动脉病变的儿童和年轻成人的动脉自旋标记灌注磁共振成像
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(1):14-21. doi: 10.1159/000355889. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
4
[Analysis of cerebral perfusion of leptomeningeal branch and perforating branch of unilateral middle cerebral artery with severe stenosis or occlusion based on multi-delay arterial spin labeling].基于多延迟动脉自旋标记对单侧大脑中动脉重度狭窄或闭塞软脑膜分支与穿支的脑灌注分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 22;101(23):1784-1790. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210207-00381.
5
A comparative study of multi and single post labeling delay pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling in patients with carotid artery stenosis.多期和单期-post 标记延迟伪连续动脉自旋标记在颈动脉狭窄患者中的对比研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Feb;106:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
6
Structural MRI of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion burden and characterization of hemispheric cerebral blood flow before and after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜剥脱术前、后颈动脉粥样硬化病变负荷的结构磁共振成像及半球脑血流特征分析
NMR Biomed. 2006 Apr;19(2):198-208. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1017.
7
Collateral perfusion using arterial spin labeling in symptomatic versus asymptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis.症状性与无症状性大脑中动脉狭窄患者的动脉自旋标记侧支灌注。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Jan;39(1):108-117. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17725212. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
8
The Utility of Arterial Transit Time Measurement for Evaluating the Hemodynamic Perfusion State of Patients with Chronic Cerebrovascular Stenosis or Occlusive Disease: Correlative Study between MR Imaging and O-labeled HO Positron Emission Tomography.动脉渡越时间测量在评估慢性脑血管狭窄或闭塞患者的血流灌注状态中的效用:MR 成像与 O-标记 HO 正电子发射断层扫描的相关性研究。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2023 Jul 1;22(3):289-300. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0123. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Arterial Spin-Labeling Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging with Dual Postlabeling Delay in Internal Carotid Artery Steno-occlusion: Validation with Digital Subtraction Angiography.颈内动脉狭窄闭塞时采用双标记后延迟的动脉自旋标记磁共振灌注成像:与数字减影血管造影术的对比验证
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Sep;25(9):2099-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Image with Dual Postlabeling Delay: A Correlative Study with Acetazolamide Loading (123)I-Iodoamphetamine Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.具有双标记后延迟的动脉自旋标记灌注磁共振成像:与乙酰唑胺负荷(123)I-碘安非他明单光子发射计算机断层扫描的相关性研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jan;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebral hemodynamics evaluation of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity in TIA patients with large artery severe stenosis or occlusion.伴有大动脉严重狭窄或闭塞的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者中液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)血管高信号的脑血流动力学评估
Front Neurol. 2025 May 14;16:1589198. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1589198. eCollection 2025.
2
Bilateral Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Asymptomatic Unilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Study.无症状单侧颈动脉狭窄中的双侧脑灌注不足:一项动脉自旋标记磁共振成像研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 22;61(5):771. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050771.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct.大面积梗死急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗试验
N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 6;388(14):1272-1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213379. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Current state and guidance on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in clinical neuroimaging.目前在临床神经影像学中动脉自旋标记灌注 MRI 的现状和指导建议。
Magn Reson Med. 2023 May;89(5):2024-2047. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29572. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Higher Baseline Cortical Score Predicts Good Outcome in Patients With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score Treated with Endovascular Treatment.
基线皮质评分较高的患者接受血管内治疗后,其 Alberta 卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分低预后良好。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Feb 16;88(3):612-618. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa472.
4
Do All ASPECT Score Regions have the Same Predictive Power for Functional Outcomes?所有 ASPECT 评分区域对功能结局的预测能力都相同吗?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104516. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104516. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
5
Influence of ASPECTS and endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.ASPECTS 评分与血管内取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jul;11(7):664-669. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014250. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.颈内动脉闭塞:病理生理学、诊断与管理。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Aug 31;19(10):41. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0677-7.
7
Relationship between haemodynamic impairment and collateral blood flow in carotid artery disease.颈动脉疾病中血液动力学障碍与侧支循环血流的关系。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 Nov;38(11):2021-2032. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17724027. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
Arterial Spin-Labeling Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging with Dual Postlabeling Delay in Internal Carotid Artery Steno-occlusion: Validation with Digital Subtraction Angiography.颈内动脉狭窄闭塞时采用双标记后延迟的动脉自旋标记磁共振灌注成像:与数字减影血管造影术的对比验证
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Sep;25(9):2099-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Image with Dual Postlabeling Delay: A Correlative Study with Acetazolamide Loading (123)I-Iodoamphetamine Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.具有双标记后延迟的动脉自旋标记灌注磁共振成像:与乙酰唑胺负荷(123)I-碘安非他明单光子发射计算机断层扫描的相关性研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jan;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
10
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.血管内溶栓联合支架取栓与单纯静脉溶栓治疗脑卒中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. Epub 2015 Apr 17.