• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clients' perceptions of motivational interviewing with couples: A qualitative examination of male couples' statements to counselors in session.来访者对夫妻动机性访谈的看法:对男性伴侣在咨询过程中向咨询师陈述的定性研究。
Couns Psychother Res. 2024 Sep;24(3):1033-1043. doi: 10.1002/capr.12723. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
5
Comparing Repeated (Annual) Couples HIV Testing and Counseling to Individual HIV Testing and Counseling Among Male Couples at High Risk of HIV Infection: Protocol for a Randomized Control Trial.比较重复(每年一次)的伴侣HIV检测与咨询和个体HIV检测与咨询对HIV感染高危男性伴侣的效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 13;13:e53023. doi: 10.2196/53023.
6
A Qualitative Analysis of Shared Values and Motivation for Change Expressed by Sexual Minority Men in Relationships: Use of the Personal Values Card Sort Activity During Motivational Interviewing Sessions Addressing Drug Use and Sexual Health.性少数群体男性在关系中表达的共同价值观和改变动机的定性分析:在针对药物使用和性健康的动机访谈会议中使用个人价值观卡片分类活动。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):3080-3092. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04392-1. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A protocol for a randomized controlled trial of couples motivational interviewing to reduce drug use and HIV transmission risk among male couples in the US: the Couples Health Project.一项关于夫妻动机访谈以减少美国男同性恋伴侣中药物使用和 HIV 传播风险的随机对照试验方案:夫妻健康项目。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):3216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20719-y.
2
Couples motivational interviewing with mobile breathalysers to reduce alcohol use in South Africa: a pilot randomised controlled trial of Masibambisane.南非使用移动呼气酒精检测仪对夫妇进行动机性访谈以减少饮酒:Masibambisane 的一项试点随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e083390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083390.

本文引用的文献

1
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing with Sexual Minority Male Couples to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk: The Couples Health Project.性少数男性伴侣动机性访谈减少药物使用和性风险的初步随机对照试验:伴侣健康计划。
AIDS Behav. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-327. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03384-9. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
Testing the drug use and condomless anal sex link among sexual minority men: The predictive utility of marijuana and interactions with relationship status.检测性少数男性中的药物使用与无保护肛交行为的关联:大麻的预测效用及与关系状况的相互作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108318. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108318. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Community-Based vs Clinic-Based Healthy Choices Motivational Intervention to Improve Health Behaviors Among Youth Living With HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区为基础与诊所为基础的健康选择动机干预在改善 HIV 感染者青少年健康行为方面的比较效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2014650. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14650.
4
Motivational interviewing with male couples to reduce substance use and HIV risk: Manifestations of partner discord and strategies for facilitating dyadic functioning.动机性访谈在减少男性伴侣群体药物使用和 HIV 风险中的应用:伴侣不和的表现形式与促进二元关系功能的策略。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020 Mar;57(1):58-67. doi: 10.1037/pst0000278. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Stigma, discrimination, and substance use among an urban sample men who have sex with men in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州城市地区男男性行为者样本中的耻辱感、歧视与药物使用情况
AIDS Care. 2020 Mar;32(3):370-378. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1683807. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
6
Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Drug Use and HIV Incidence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in Relationships and Are High Priority for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Project PARTNER): Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.动机性访谈以减少处于恋爱关系且是暴露前预防高优先级人群的男男性行为者的药物使用及艾滋病毒感染率(PARTNER项目):随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 4;8(7):e13015. doi: 10.2196/13015.
7
A Pilot Randomized Trial of Intervention Components Addressing Drug Use in Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) with Male Couples.一项针对在男男性接触者 HIV 检测和咨询(CHTC)中干预药物使用的干预内容的初步随机试验。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(9):2407-2420. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02455-2.
8
Motivational interviewing with couples: A theoretical framework for clinical practice illustrated in substance use and HIV prevention intervention with gay male couples.夫妻动机性访谈:临床实践的理论框架,以男同性恋伴侣的物质使用和艾滋病毒预防干预为例说明
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2018 Dec;5(4):490-502. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000297. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness.激励式访谈、增强型干预和简短干预在过去十年中的效果和效率:综述评论。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(8):862-887. doi: 10.1037/adb0000318.
10
Actor-Partner Effects of Male Couples Substance Use with Sex and Engagement in Condomless Anal Sex.男同性恋伴侣物质使用与性行为及无保护肛交参与情况的行为者-伴侣效应
AIDS Behav. 2016 Dec;20(12):2904-2913. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1355-4.

来访者对夫妻动机性访谈的看法:对男性伴侣在咨询过程中向咨询师陈述的定性研究。

Clients' perceptions of motivational interviewing with couples: A qualitative examination of male couples' statements to counselors in session.

作者信息

Starks Tyrel J, Cruse Carolyn, Kyre Kory, Bosco Stephen C, Ingersoll Karen S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.

Doctoral Program in Health Psychology and Clinical Science, Graduate Center of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Couns Psychother Res. 2024 Sep;24(3):1033-1043. doi: 10.1002/capr.12723. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1002/capr.12723
PMID:39355506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11441635/
Abstract

The past two decades have seen expanding interest in the application of Motivational Interviewing (MI) with couples. Thus far, literature detailing the development of MI with couples has focused primarily on elucidating counseling processes and techniques or on evaluating intervention effects. To date no published studies have examined client-perceptions of the counseling process in MI with couples. This study involved qualitative analysis of 55 sessions from 24 couple (48 individuals) who received short (3-session) courses of MI with couples in the context of a randomized controlled trial. All participants identified as cisgender male and were 18 or older. In each couple, at least one partner was aged 18 to 29, HIV negative, and reported drug use in the past 30 days. Analysis revealed that client couples attributed the benefits of MI with couples to the expectancy-related effects s (merely structuring time to talk) and common factors (the presence of the counsellor as a non-judgmental observer). Clients also conveyed appreciation for techniques and activities that enhanced dyadic functioning through communication skill building and the identification of shared values. Finally, clients appreciated the opportunity to discuss drug use and sexual behavior in an integrated way. Findings indicate the utility of counselor-delivered behavioral interventions. They also align with recent formulations of the counselor's role in MI with couples as well as the introduction of facilitating dyadic functioning as a distinct process. Finally, they highlight the potential value of training counselors to address the intersection of drug use, sexual risk, and sexual pleasure in sessions. These dimensions of practice receive inconsistent attention across counseling training program curricula.

摘要

在过去二十年中,人们对将动机性访谈(MI)应用于伴侣关系的兴趣不断增加。到目前为止,详细阐述伴侣关系中动机性访谈发展的文献主要集中在阐明咨询过程和技巧,或评估干预效果。迄今为止,尚未有已发表的研究考察过伴侣关系中动机性访谈咨询过程的服务对象认知。本研究对24对伴侣(48人)的55次咨询进行了定性分析,这些伴侣在一项随机对照试验的背景下接受了简短(3次咨询)的伴侣关系动机性访谈课程。所有参与者均为顺性别男性,年龄在18岁及以上。每对伴侣中,至少有一方年龄在18至29岁之间,HIV检测呈阴性,且报告在过去30天内有吸毒行为。分析表明,接受咨询的伴侣将伴侣关系动机性访谈的益处归因于与期望相关的效果(仅仅是安排谈话时间)和共同因素(咨询师作为无评判的观察者的存在)。服务对象还对通过沟通技能培养和共同价值观识别来增强二元功能的技巧和活动表示赞赏。最后,服务对象对有机会综合讨论吸毒和性行为表示感激。研究结果表明了咨询师提供的行为干预的效用。它们还与最近对咨询师在伴侣关系动机性访谈中的角色的阐述以及将促进二元功能作为一个独特过程的引入相一致。最后,它们突出了培训咨询师在咨询过程中处理吸毒、性风险和性快感交叉问题的潜在价值。在整个咨询培训项目课程中,这些实践维度受到的关注并不一致。