Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉内注入200μg乙酰胆碱至左冠状动脉作为血管反应性测试的安全性和有效性:与冠状动脉内最大注入100μg乙酰胆碱的比较。

Safety and Usefulness of Intracoronary Acetylcholine 200 μg Into the Left Coronary Artery as Vasoreactivity Testing: Comparisons With Intracoronary Acetylcholine Maximum 100 μg.

作者信息

Sueda Shozo, Hayashi Yutaka, Ono Hiroki, Sakaue Tomoki, Ikeda Shuntaro

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Minami Matsuyama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Niihama, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):e70001. doi: 10.1002/clc.70001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively analyzed the usefulness and safety of intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) 200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) as vasoreactivity testing compared with intracoronary ACh 100 μg.

METHODS

We recruited 1433 patients who had angina-like chest pain and intracoronary ACh testing in the LCA, including 1234 patients with a maximum ACh 100 μg and 199 patients with a maximum ACh 200 μg. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as ≥ 90% stenosis, usual chest pain, and ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes.

RESULTS

The incidence of coronary constriction ≥ 90%, usual chest pain, and ischemic ECG changes with a maximum ACh of 100 μg was markedly higher than that with a maximum ACh of 200 μg. The frequency of unusual chest pain in patients with a maximum ACh of 200 μg was higher than that in those with a maximum ACh of 100 μg (13% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). In patients with rest angina, positive spasm of maximum ACh 100 μg was significantly higher than that of maximum ACh 200 μg, whereas there was no difference regarding positive spasm in patients with atypical chest pain between the two ACh doses. Major complications (1.38% vs. 1.51%, p = 0.8565) and the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (1.81% vs. 2.63%, p = 0.6307) during ACh testing in the LCA were not different between the two maximum ACH doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary ACh 200 μg into the LCA is clinically useful and safe for vasoreactivity testing when intracoronary ACh 100 μg dose not provoke spasms.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性分析了与冠状动脉内注射100μg乙酰胆碱(ACh)相比,向左冠状动脉(LCA)内注射200μg ACh进行血管反应性测试的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们招募了1433例有类似心绞痛胸痛症状且接受了LCA内ACh测试的患者,其中包括1234例最大注射剂量为100μg ACh的患者和199例最大注射剂量为200μg ACh的患者。以20/50/100/200μg的递增剂量向LCA内注射ACh。阳性痉挛定义为狭窄≥90%、典型胸痛以及缺血性心电图(ECG)改变。

结果

最大ACh剂量为100μg时冠状动脉收缩≥90%、典型胸痛以及缺血性ECG改变的发生率显著高于最大ACh剂量为200μg时。最大ACh剂量为200μg的患者中不典型胸痛的发生率高于最大ACh剂量为100μg的患者(13%对3%,p<0.001)。在静息性心绞痛患者中,最大ACh剂量为100μg时的阳性痉挛显著高于最大ACh剂量为200μg时,而在非典型胸痛患者中,两种ACh剂量下的阳性痉挛没有差异。在LCA内进行ACh测试期间,两种最大ACh剂量下的主要并发症(1.38%对1.51%,p=0.8565)以及阵发性心房颤动的发生率(1.81%对2.63%,p=0.6307)没有差异。

结论

当冠状动脉内注射100μg ACh未引发痉挛时,向LCA内注射200μg ACh进行血管反应性测试在临床上是有效且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5844/11445603/94291039ab29/CLC-47-e70001-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验