• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脱细胞真皮基质用于乳房重建效果的统计脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价

Statistical Fragility of Outcomes on Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Wang Anya, Kim Esther, Kwon Daniel, Coleman-Belin Janet, Oleru Olachi, Seyidova Nargiz, Taub Peter J

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 May 1;155(5):845e-853e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011798. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011798
PMID:39356685
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is pivotal in breast surgery, yet the statistical robustness of surgical outcomes remains underexplored. This study uses the fragility index (FI), reverse FI, and fragility quotient (FQ) to investigate the statistical fragility of ADM breast reconstruction outcomes.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (2013 to present) with dichotomous outcomes were sourced from PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Medline, and Cochrane databases. FI and reverse FI (event reversals needed to alter outcome significance) and FQ (standardized fragility across trials) were computed and reported as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Subgroup analysis focused on intervention types.

RESULTS

Of 33 studies screened, 19 RCTs comprising 204 outcomes were included, with a median FI of 4 (IQR, 3 to 5) and FQ of 0.039 (IQR, 0.029 to 0.070). Twenty-six outcomes achieved statistical significance, with a median FI of 3.5 (IQR, 1 to 5) and FQ of 0.033 (IQR, 0.010 to 0.073). The remaining 178 outcomes were not significant, exhibiting a median FI of 4 (IQR, 3 to 5) and FQ of 0.040 (IQR, 0.030 to 0.070). Of the 204 outcomes, 18% had a number of patients lost to follow-up equal to or surpassing the FI. By intervention type, the median FIs were similar in value but remained low.

CONCLUSIONS

ADM-related breast reconstruction outcomes are statistically fragile; thus, reversal of a few outcomes or maintaining follow-up with patients may alter the significance of findings. Future researchers are thus recommended to report FI and FQ metrics with P values to accurately portray reconstructive surgery outcomes.

摘要

背景

脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在乳腺手术中至关重要,但手术结果的统计稳健性仍未得到充分探索。本研究使用脆弱性指数(FI)、反向FI和脆弱性商数(FQ)来研究ADM乳房重建结果的统计脆弱性。

方法

从PubMed、Embase、SCOPUS、Medline和Cochrane数据库中获取2013年至今具有二分结果的随机对照试验。计算FI和反向FI(改变结果显著性所需的事件逆转数)以及FQ(各试验间的标准化脆弱性),并报告为中位数(四分位间距[IQR])。亚组分析聚焦于干预类型。

结果

在筛选的33项研究中,纳入了19项随机对照试验,共204个结果,FI中位数为4(IQR,3至5),FQ为0.039(IQR,0.029至0.070)。26个结果具有统计学显著性,FI中位数为3.5(IQR,1至5),FQ为0.033(IQR,0.010至0.073)。其余178个结果无显著性,FI中位数为4(IQR,3至5),FQ为0.040(IQR,0.030至0.070)。在204个结果中,18%的失访患者数量等于或超过FI。按干预类型划分,FI中位数在数值上相似但仍然较低。

结论

ADM相关的乳房重建结果在统计学上较为脆弱;因此,少数结果的逆转或与患者保持随访可能会改变研究结果的显著性。因此,建议未来的研究人员在报告P值时同时报告FI和FQ指标,以准确描述重建手术结果。

相似文献

1
Statistical Fragility of Outcomes on Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.脱细胞真皮基质用于乳房重建效果的统计脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 May 1;155(5):845e-853e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011798. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Statistical fragility of outcomes in acellular dermal matrix literature: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.脱细胞真皮基质文献中结局的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.047. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
3
The fragility of statistical findings in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.反式全肩关节置换文献中统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1650-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
The Statistical Fragility of Tranexamic Acid Use in the Orthopaedic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.《矫形外科文献中氨甲环酸使用的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价》。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun 1;32(11):508-515. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00503. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
The fragility of statistical findings in the intertrochanteric fracture fixation literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.转子间骨折固定文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 22;145(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05804-0.
6
Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.随机对照试验比较骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在前交叉韧带重建术中的应用:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
The statistical fragility of vertebroplasty outcomes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.椎体成形术结果的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):26-33. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_13_25. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
8
The Statistical Fragility of Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.全膝关节置换术中髌骨表面置换的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Mar;40(3):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
9
Randomized trials evaluating volar locking plates against casting of distal radius fractures are statistically fragile: A systematic review.评估掌侧锁定钢板与桡骨远端骨折石膏固定效果的随机试验在统计学上缺乏说服力:一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 21;64:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.014. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in the Femoral Neck Fracture Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.股骨颈骨折文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e230-e237. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002793.

引用本文的文献

1
Bony Septal Grafts Enhance Aesthetic Subunits and Ventilation in Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.骨鼻中隔移植术可改善单侧唇裂鼻畸形的美学亚单位及通气功能。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04920-x.