Kacimi Salah Eddine O, Dehais Caroline, Feuvret Loïc, Chinot Olivier, Carpentier Catherine, Bronnimann Charlotte, Vauleon Elodie, Djelad Apolline, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal Elizabeth, Langlois Olivier, Campone Mario, Ducloie Mathilde, Noel Georges, Cuzzubbo Stefania, Taillandier Luc, Ramirez Carole, Younan Nadia, Menei Philippe, Dhermain Frédéric, Desenclos Christine, Ghiringhelli François, Bourg Veronique, Ricard Damien, Faillot Thierry, Appay Romain, Tabouret Emeline, Nichelli Lucia, Mathon Bertrand, Thomas Alice, Tran Suzanne, Bielle Franck, Alentorn Agusti, Iorgulescu J Bryan, Boëlle Pierre-Yves, Labreche Karim, Hoang-Xuan Khê, Sanson Marc, Idbaih Ahmed, Figarella-Branger Dominique, Ducray François, Touat Mehdi
Institut du Cerveau, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Inserm, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, SIRIC CURAMUS, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, CinBioS, UMS 37 PASS, INSERM, Paris, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 20;43(3):329-338. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00049. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Patients with IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3) benefit from adding alkylating agent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT). However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen between procarbazine, 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) and temozolomide (TMZ) remains unclear given the lack of randomized trial data comparing both regimens.
The objective was to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) associated with first-line PCV/RT versus TMZ/RT in patients newly diagnosed with O3. We included patients with histologically proven O3 (according to WHO criteria) from the French national prospective cohort (POLA). All tumors underwent central pathologic review. OS and PFS from surgery were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model.
305 newly diagnosed patients with O3 treated with RT and chemotherapy between 2008 and 2022 were included, of which 67.9% of patients (n = 207) were treated with PCV/RT and 32.1% with TMZ/RT (n = 98). The median follow-up was 78.4 months (IQR, 44.3-102.7). The median OS was not reached (95% CI, Not reached [NR] to NR) in the PCV/RT group and was 140 months (95% CI, 110 to NR) in the TMZ/RT group (log-rank = .0033). On univariable analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of PCV/RT in both 5-year (PCV/RT: 89%, 95% CI, 85 to 94; TMZ/RT: 75%, 95% CI, 66 to 84) and 10-year OS (PCV/RT: 72%, 95% CI, 61 to 85; TMZ/RT: 60%, 95% CI, 49 to 73), which was confirmed using the multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, type of surgery, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and homozygous deletion (hazard ratio, 0.53 for PCV/RT, 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.92, = .025).
In patients with newly diagnosed O3 from the POLA cohort, first-line PCV/RT was associated with better OS outcomes compared with TMZ/RT. Our data suggest that the improved safety profile associated with TMZ comes at the cost of inferior efficacy in this population. Further investigation using prospective randomized studies is warranted.
异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变型1p/19q共缺失的3级少突胶质细胞瘤(O3)患者在放疗(RT)基础上加用烷化剂化疗可获益。然而,鉴于缺乏比较丙卡巴肼、1-(2-氯乙基)-3-环己基-1-亚硝基脲(CCNU)和长春新碱(PCV)与替莫唑胺(TMZ)这两种化疗方案的随机试验数据,最佳化疗方案仍不明确。
目的是评估新诊断为O3的患者一线接受PCV/RT与TMZ/RT治疗后的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。我们纳入了来自法国国家前瞻性队列(POLA)中组织学确诊为O3(根据世界卫生组织标准)的患者。所有肿瘤均接受了中心病理复查。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归模型估计手术后的OS和PFS。
纳入了2008年至2022年间接受放疗和化疗的305例新诊断为O3的患者,其中67.9%的患者(n = 207)接受了PCV/RT治疗,32.1%的患者(n = 98)接受了TMZ/RT治疗。中位随访时间为78.4个月(四分位间距,44.3 - 102.7)。PCV/RT组未达到中位OS(95%置信区间,未达到[NR]至NR),TMZ/RT组为140个月(95%置信区间,110至NR)(对数秩检验 = 0.0033)。单因素分析显示,在5年(PCV/RT:89%,95%置信区间,85至94;TMZ/RT:75%,95%置信区间,66至84)和10年总生存期方面(PCV/RT:72%,95%置信区间,61至85;TMZ/RT:60%,95%置信区间,49至73),PCV/RT均有显著优势,在对年龄、手术类型、性别、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态和纯合缺失进行校正的多变量Cox模型中也得到了证实(PCV/RT的风险比为0.53,95%置信区间,0.30至0.92,P = 0.025)。
在POLA队列新诊断为O3的患者中,一线PCV/RT与TMZ/RT相比,OS结局更好。我们的数据表明,TMZ相关的安全性改善是以该人群疗效较差为代价的。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性随机研究。