Abbasi Behzad, Hacker Emily, Ghaffar Umar, Hakam Nizar, Li Kevin D, Alazzawi Sultan, Fernandez Adrian, Patel Hiren V, Breyer Benjamin N
Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Urol. 2025 Jan;213(1):99-109. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004264. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
We compare Fournier gangrene in female and male patients and identify mortality-associated characteristics in both.
We used National Inpatient Sample data (2016-2020) to identify Fournier gangrene cases and extracted demographic, comorbidity, and procedural variables. Multivariable regression models were used to identify mortality risk factors for both cohorts.
We identified 2875 female (31%) and 6451 male patients (69%) with Fournier gangrene corresponding to an estimated 14,375 (95% CI, 13,784-14,966) and 32,255 (95% CI, 31,390-33,120) cases, respectively. Female patients were more likely to die than male patients (7.1% vs 5.7%, < .0001, respectively). The median incidence rates were 1.7 (interquartile range, 1.5-1.8) and 4 (interquartile range, 3.6-4.3) cases per 100,000 person-years for female and male patients, respectively. Female patients had higher median age, longer hospital stays, more charges, procedures, and fecal diversion rates, but lower routine discharges than male patients ( < .05). Non-White female patients had increased mortality odds compared with White female patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.07; = .019). Prolonged interval until initial perineal debridement correlated with higher mortality odds in both female and male patients (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1-1.04; = .034 vs OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; < .0001). Diabetes lowered mortality odds in female and male patients (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; = .046 vs OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.7; < .0001).
In female patients, Fournier gangrene incidence surpasses previous reports, with slightly worse outcomes compared with male patients, emphasizing the need for precise clinical assessment and early intensive interventions.
我们比较女性和男性患者的福尼尔坏疽,并确定两者与死亡率相关的特征。
我们使用国家住院样本数据(2016 - 2020年)来识别福尼尔坏疽病例,并提取人口统计学、合并症和手术变量。多变量回归模型用于确定两个队列的死亡风险因素。
我们识别出2875例女性(31%)和6451例男性患者(69%)患有福尼尔坏疽,估计分别对应14375例(95%可信区间,13784 - 14966)和32255例(95%可信区间,31390 - 33120)。女性患者比男性患者更易死亡(分别为7.1%对5.7%,P <.0001)。女性和男性患者每10万人年的发病率中位数分别为1.7(四分位间距,1.5 - 1.8)和4(四分位间距,3.6 - 4.3)例。女性患者的年龄中位数更高、住院时间更长、费用更高、手术更多、粪便转流率更高,但常规出院率低于男性患者(P <.05)。非白人女性患者与白人女性患者相比,死亡几率增加(优势比[OR],1.49;95%可信区间,1.07 - 2.07;P =.019)。女性和男性患者中,直至初次会阴清创的间隔时间延长与更高的死亡几率相关(OR,1.02;95%可信区间,1 - 1.04;P =.034对OR,1.03;95%可信区间,1.01 - 1.05;P <.0001)。糖尿病降低了女性和男性患者的死亡几率(OR,0.68;95%可信区间,0.47 - 0.99;P =.046对OR,0.54;95%可信区间,0.41 - 0.7;P <.0001)。
在女性患者中,福尼尔坏疽的发病率超过先前报告,与男性患者相比结局略差,强调需要进行精确的临床评估和早期强化干预。