Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Nov 1;264:112458. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112458. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is an effective treatment but is associated with poor adherence during smoking cessation attempts. This study aimed to determine if In Vivo Sampling, an experiential intervention that includes sampling of NRT in-session, increases NRT adherence and smoking abstinence compared to standard smoking cessation behavioral counseling.
Eligible participants were under community corrections supervision and smoked five or more cigarettes per day for the past year. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either In Vivo Sampling or standard smoking cessation behavioral counseling. Both interventions involved four 30-minute sessions and received 12 weeks of combination NRT. Self-reported NRT adherence, quit attempts, and carbon monoxide (CO)-verified smoking cessation were measured at one, three-, and six-months post-intervention.
From 2017-2022, 515 participants were enrolled and randomized. The In Vivo Sampling group had significantly greater mean adherence to patch and lozenge NRT regimens (71 % vs. 60 %, OR: 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.36-1.96, p<.001). The In Vivo group had a significantly higher likelihood of quit attempts across time (61 % vs. 53 %, OR: 1.4, 95 % CI: 1.05-1.87, p=.021). Groups did not significantly differ on the percent of participants who had quit smoking at 6 months post-intervention (17 % In Vivo Sampling vs. 13 % standard counseling, OR: 1.43, p=.24).
In Vivo Sampling demonstrated better NRT adherence and quit attempts but similar cessation rates to standard behavioral counseling. The In Vivo Sampling intervention represents a novel approach that increased behaviors typically associated with successful cessation over standard behavioral counseling.
尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)是一种有效的治疗方法,但在戒烟尝试中与较差的依从性相关。本研究旨在确定体验式干预措施 In Vivo Sampling(包括在治疗过程中采样 NRT)是否比标准戒烟行为咨询更能提高 NRT 的依从性和戒烟成功率。
符合条件的参与者正在社区监督下接受监管,且在过去一年中每天吸烟五支或以上。参与者被随机分配接受 In Vivo Sampling 或标准戒烟行为咨询。两种干预措施均包括四次 30 分钟的疗程,并接受 12 周的联合 NRT。在干预后一个月、三个月和六个月时测量自我报告的 NRT 依从性、戒烟尝试和一氧化碳(CO)验证的戒烟情况。
在 2017-2022 年期间,共有 515 名参与者被纳入并随机分组。In Vivo Sampling 组对贴片和口含尼古丁糖剂的 NRT 治疗方案的依从性显著更高(71%对 60%,OR:1.63,95%CI:1.36-1.96,p<.001)。In Vivo 组在整个时间范围内尝试戒烟的可能性显著更高(61%对 53%,OR:1.4,95%CI:1.05-1.87,p=.021)。两组在干预后 6 个月时戒烟的参与者比例无显著差异(In Vivo Sampling 组 17%,标准咨询组 13%,OR:1.43,p=.24)。
In Vivo Sampling 显示出更好的 NRT 依从性和戒烟尝试,但与标准行为咨询的戒烟率相似。In Vivo Sampling 干预代表了一种新的方法,与标准行为咨询相比,它增加了与成功戒烟相关的行为。