Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚人工林碳抵消方法能否增加碳储量和木材供应?来自澳大利亚绿三角人工林地区的案例研究。

Can Australian plantation forest carbon offset methods increase carbon storage and timber supply? A case study from the Green Triangle plantation forestry region in Australia.

机构信息

CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Waite Campus, Gate 4 Waite Road, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia; CSIRO Towards Net Zero Mission, Australia; Centre for Markets, Values and Inclusion, UniSA Business, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.

Centre for Markets, Values and Inclusion, UniSA Business, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122632. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122632. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

Abstract

The plantation forestry estate in Australia has been in decline for a decade or more. Previous studies attribute observed investment inertia to factors including the long-term nature of forestry investments, high up front establishment cost and more recently water resource constraints. The introduction of plantation forestry methods as part of the Australian Carbon Credit Unit Scheme in 2017 has generated renewed interest in plantation forestry as a carbon abatement option. To assess this opportunity, we performed high spatial resolution bioeconomic modelling of southeastern Australia's Green Triangle forestry region to understand the joint influence of site productivity, species selection and spatially variable costs including agricultural land prices and transport distances on land use change and additional future timber flows. We found that additional plantations may be economically viable at a carbon price of AU$39/t COe. New softwood (P. radiata) plantations provide the lowest cost option across the region when compared to hardwood (E. globulus). However, at carbon prices below AU$50/t COe comparatively little technically feasible abatement is possible for both plantation species with only 632,000 t COe from hardwood and 12.9 Mt COe, from softwood under economically optimised conditions which equates to 0.13 and 2.5 percent of Australia's 2023 emissions respectively. We found however that this may translate to significant additional timber flows for the region's processing industry even at lower carbon prices. We estimated an additional 62,600 green metric tonnes of hardwood (1 percent of annual Australian plantation hardwood harvest) and 6.6 million m of cumulative softwood (44 percent supply of annual Australian plantation softwood harvest) over a 50-year period at AU$40/t COe. However, the results were found to be sensitive to discount rate assumptions. The discussion focuses on the economic and policy factors that may enable/limit the use of carbon markets to expand the Australian plantation forestry estate.

摘要

澳大利亚的人工林产业已经衰退了十年或更长时间。先前的研究将观察到的投资惰性归因于林业投资的长期性、前期建设成本高以及最近水资源限制等因素。2017 年,作为澳大利亚碳信用单位计划的一部分,引入了人工林方法,这重新激发了人们对人工林作为碳减排选择的兴趣。为了评估这一机会,我们对澳大利亚东南部绿三角林业地区进行了高空间分辨率的生物经济建模,以了解土地利用变化和未来额外木材流的联合影响,包括土地生产力、物种选择以及空间变化成本,如农业土地价格和运输距离。我们发现,在碳价为 39 澳元/吨 COe 的情况下,额外的人工林可能在经济上可行。与硬木(Eucalyptus globulus)相比,新的软木(Pinus radiata)人工林在整个地区提供了最低成本的选择。然而,在碳价低于 50 澳元/吨 COe 的情况下,对于两种造林树种,只有相对较少的技术可行减排量是可行的,在经济优化条件下,硬木的减排量为 632,000 吨 COe,软木的减排量为 12.9 百万吨 COe,分别相当于澳大利亚 2023 年排放量的 0.13%和 2.5%。然而,我们发现,即使在较低的碳价下,这也可能使该地区的加工行业增加大量额外的木材流。我们估计,在 50 年内,碳价为 40 澳元/吨 COe 时,硬木将增加 62600 绿色公吨(占澳大利亚人工林硬木年采伐量的 1%),软木将增加 660 万立方米(占澳大利亚人工林软木年采伐量的 44%)。然而,结果发现对贴现率假设很敏感。讨论的重点是可能使/限制利用碳市场扩大澳大利亚人工林产业的经济和政策因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验