Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Biosens Bioelectron. 2025 Jan 1;267:116809. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116809. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) serve as a crucial serological indicator for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) is mainly used in clinical diagnosis of SLE, but suffers from low specificity, partially because the use of dsDNA antigens of varied sources in current CIA kits that sometimes led to controversial results. On the basis that anti-dsDNA in healthy individuals tend to selectively bind with dsDNA originating from pathogens, whereas pathogenic anti-dsDNA in SLE patients bind all forms of dsDNA, here we proposed the use of dsDNA fragment derived from human genome as antigen (synthesized via PCR using the human genomic DNA as the template). A magnetic bead-based immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was thus developed for SLE diagnosis, which exhibited improved sensitivity and specificity over CIA using the WHO reference reagent (15/174) as standard. For clinical serum sample analysis (n = 590), IFA exhibited an accuracy of 71.9% that was higher than CIA (65.3%). Crucially, the IFA results exhibited stronger correlations with the activity of SLE, renal involvement, and its prognosis. Besides the improved clinical diagnosis, the proposed IFA also holds great promise in assay standardization due to the high homogeneity of the synthetic dsDNA.
抗双链 DNA 抗体(anti-dsDNA)是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的重要血清学指标。化学发光免疫分析(CIA)主要用于 SLE 的临床诊断,但特异性较低,部分原因是当前 CIA 试剂盒中使用的 dsDNA 抗原来源多样,有时会导致结果存在争议。基于健康个体中的抗 dsDNA 倾向于选择性结合源自病原体的 dsDNA,而 SLE 患者中的致病性抗 dsDNA 则结合所有形式的 dsDNA,因此我们提出使用源自人类基因组的 dsDNA 片段作为抗原(通过 PCR 合成,模板为人类基因组 DNA)。因此,我们开发了一种基于磁珠的免疫荧光分析(IFA)用于 SLE 诊断,与使用世界卫生组织参考试剂(15/174)作为标准的 CIA 相比,该方法的灵敏度和特异性得到了提高。用于临床血清样本分析(n=590),IFA 的准确性为 71.9%,高于 CIA(65.3%)。至关重要的是,IFA 结果与 SLE 的活动、肾脏受累及其预后的相关性更强。除了改善临床诊断外,由于合成 dsDNA 的高度均一性,该 IFA 还在检测标准化方面具有很大的应用前景。