Letter to the Editor.
作者信息
Koninckx P R, Ussia A, Amro B, Wattiez A, Adamyan L
出版信息
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):375-376. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.040.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Letter to the Editor.致编辑的信。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):375-376. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.040.
2
An article on "letter to the editor".一篇关于“致编辑的信”的文章。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023 Apr-Jun;27(2):254-256. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_65_23. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Authors' response to letter to the editor, letter to the editor: Authors' response to letter to the editor: Safety concerns with human papilloma virus immunization in Japan: Analysis and evaluation of Nagoya City's surveillance data for adverse events.作者对编辑来信的回复，编辑来信：作者对编辑来信的回复：日本人类乳头瘤病毒免疫接种的安全性问题：名古屋市不良事件监测数据的分析与评估
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jan;17(1):e12310. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12310. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
How to write an editorial letter?如何撰写编辑信函？
Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(Suppl 1):41-3. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.053.
5
Letter to the Editor - The implications of the professionalization of health promotion in Canada: a response to JR Graham's letter to the editor.给编辑的信——加拿大健康促进专业化的影响：对 JR Graham 给编辑的信的回应。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 May;37(5):172-173. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.5.05.
6
LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.致编辑的信：标准（信件）：作者、审稿人和编辑须知
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Sep 30;39(37):e296. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e296.
7
Letter #1 Response to letter to Editor by Dr. Sarkar et al. for' who said differentiating preeclampsia from COVID-19 infection was easy? Refers to PII: S2210-7789(21)00539-0 Letter #2 Response to letter to Editor by Dr. Hantoushzadeh et al. for' is COVID-19 disease a risk factor for preeclampsia? Should aspirin be considered for prophylaxis of preeclampsia in these patients?' Refers to PII: S2210-7789(21)00538-9.信件1：对Sarkar博士等人致编辑的信的回复，信的主题为“谁说区分先兆子痫和新冠病毒感染很容易？”，涉及编号：S2210 - 7789(21)00539 - 0
信件2：对Hantoushzadeh博士等人致编辑的信的回复，信的主题为“新冠病毒疾病是先兆子痫的危险因素吗？这些患者是否应考虑使用阿司匹林预防先兆子痫？”，涉及编号：S2210 - 7789(21)00538 - 9
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022 Mar;27:94-95. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
8
Letter to the Editor Regarding "Editor-in-Chief's April 2021 Letter on 'The Humility Button'".致编辑的信：关于“主编2021年4月关于‘谦逊按钮’的信”
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:209-210. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.127.
9
Reply to Letter to the Editor: Author Response to Letter to the Editor.致编辑信件的回复：作者对致编辑信件的回应。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb 1;31(3):e133-e134. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00805. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
Letter to the Editor: Letter to the Editor regarding 'Psychotogenic potential of prescribed drugs'.致编辑的信：关于“处方药的致幻潜力”致编辑的信
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;58(2):188. doi: 10.1177/00048674231211501. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Truth, Soft Lies, Statistics, and Experience in Managing Endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症管理中的真相、善意谎言、统计学与经验
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 May;46(5):102421. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102421.
2
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡.用于诊断盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症的非侵入性成像技术及子宫内膜异位症分类系统：国际共识声明†，‡
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Jun;16(2):127-144. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.012.
3
A proof of concept that experience-based management of endometriosis can complement evidence-based guidelines.一项基于经验的子宫内膜异位症管理可补充循证指南的概念验证。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Sep;15(3):197-214. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.3.094.
4
Predictive Value of Ultrasound Imaging for Diagnosis and Surgery of Deep Endometriosis: A Systematic Review.超声影像学对深部子宫内膜异位症的诊断和手术的预测价值：系统评价。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jul;30(7):536-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.03.008. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Preoperative imaging of deep endometriosis: pitfalls of a diagnostic test before surgery.深部子宫内膜异位症的术前影像学检查：手术前诊断性检查的陷阱
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Jan 8;12(4):265-271.
6
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症非侵入性诊断的成像方式
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2.
7
The title is misleading: an opinion paper is not a consensus paper.这个标题具有误导性：一篇观点论文并非共识性论文。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3161. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det281. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Zotero 插件