Huang Yanqiao, Wang Qiong, Li Xiaofang, Zhao Xiujuan, Huang Xinhua, Ma Wei, Yu Shanshan, Lu Lin, Ding Xiaoyan, Sun Limei
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Br J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 20;109(4):476-481. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324517.
To evaluate the visual function and foveal architecture in patients with stage 3 idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM).
A cross-sectional observational study included 56 eyes of 52 patients with stage 3 iERM. The patients were classified into type A ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL) and type B EIFL based on the presence of a continuous hyporeflective band. Visual function and foveal microarchitecture were assessed in enrolled eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia scores, retinal sensitivity and optical coherence tomography (OCT)/OCT angiography features were compared between two subtypes.
The BCVA in type A EIFL and type B EIFL was 0.22 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (0.15 logMAR, 0.40 logMAR) and 0.53±0.23 logMAR, respectively (p=0.002). Type B EIFL had higher average metamorphopsia scores, especially horizontal metamorphopsia scores, than type A (p=0.013, p=0.007, respectively). Type B EIFL had worse central 2° foveal sensitivity than type A (p=0.034). Type B EIFL had thicker central foveal thickness and EIFL thickness (514.08±73.80 µm vs 444.41±56.57 µm, p=0.001; 159.75±78.30 µm vs 48.44±18.37 µm, p<0.0001; respectively). The foveal avascular zone area of type B EIFL was smaller than that of type A (0.042±0.022 mm vs 0.077±0.039 mm, p<0.0001). The vessel density and flow area of the superficial vascular complex in type B EIFL were larger than those in type A (both p=0.001).
Type B EIFL demonstrated significantly worse visual function than type A EIFL, along with marked differences in foveal microstructure and microvasculature. Our study complements the current staging of iERM and helps determine the optimal timing of iERM surgery.
评估3期特发性视网膜前膜(iERM)患者的视觉功能和黄斑结构。
一项横断面观察性研究纳入了52例3期iERM患者的56只眼。根据连续低反射带的存在情况,将患者分为A型异位性黄斑内层(EIFL)和B型EIFL。对纳入研究的眼睛评估视觉功能和黄斑微观结构。比较两种亚型之间的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视物变形评分、视网膜敏感度和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)/OCT血管造影特征。
A型EIFL和B型EIFL的BCVA分别为0.22最小分辨角对数(logMAR)(0.15 logMAR,0.40 logMAR)和0.53±0.23 logMAR(p = 0.002)。B型EIFL的平均视物变形评分更高,尤其是水平视物变形评分,高于A型(分别为p = 0.013,p = 0.007)。B型EIFL的中央2°黄斑敏感度比A型差(p = 0.034)。B型EIFL的中央黄斑厚度和EIFL厚度更大(514.08±73.80 µm对444.41±56.57 µm,p = 0.001;159.75±78.30 µm对48.44±18.37 µm,p<0.0001)。B型EIFL的黄斑无血管区面积小于A型(0.042±0.022 mm对0.077±0.039 mm,p<0.0001)。B型EIFL浅层血管复合体的血管密度和血流面积大于A型(均为p = 0.001)。
B型EIFL的视觉功能明显比A型EIFL差,同时黄斑微结构和微血管存在显著差异。我们的研究补充了当前iERM的分期,并有助于确定iERM手术的最佳时机。