Suppr超能文献

马龙术后会怎样?顺行性可控灌肠术后长期管理的调查。

What Happens Post-Malone? An Investigation of Long-Term Postoperative Management of Antegrade Continence Enemas.

作者信息

Encisco Ellen M, Garza Ramiro, McNinch Neil L, Davis Carolyn, Rosen Nelson G, Rymeski Beth, Frischer Jason S, Garrison Aaron P, Huntington Justin T

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA; Colorectal Center, Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

The University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jan;60(1):161958. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161958. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An option for medically refractory fecal incontinence and/or constipation is the antegrade continence enema (ACE). We investigated ACE usage and its perceptions, including whether patients were able to discontinue use of the appendicostomy/cecostomy tube.

METHODS

Patients who underwent appendicostomy creation or cecostomy tube placement at two institutions between 2012 and 2021 were reviewed. Patients or parents/guardians were contacted for completion of a survey. Summary statistics for clinical data were tabulated and associations were evaluated with chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were included, including 92 (55.8%) males. Eighty-two (49.7%) surveys were completed. Most patients (51.5%) presented with fecal incontinence; 38 (23.3%) presented with constipation. More patients had a primary underlying diagnosis of anorectal malformation (39.4%), followed by functional constipation (21.2%), Hirschsprung disease (18.8%), and spinal malformation (17.6%). Thirty-six (21.8%) patients discontinued flushes by time of contact, with switch to laxatives being the most common reason (19%), followed by appendicostomy stricture/obstruction/closure (17%), switch to ileostomy/colostomy (17%), and patient preference (14%). There was no difference in patients' ability to stop using flushes based on underlying diagnosis (p = 0.31). The majority (84.1%) of respondents were "very likely" to recommend antegrade enemas to other children with similar diagnosis and 76.8% reported being "very satisfied" that the operation was done.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains a high degree of satisfaction with antegrade continence enemas for children with constipation and fecal incontinence; some children may be able to stop using antegrade enemas with varied mechanisms including patient/family weaning versus with assistance and laxative trials.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

对于药物治疗无效的大便失禁和/或便秘,一种选择是顺行性节制灌肠(ACE)。我们调查了ACE的使用情况及其相关看法,包括患者是否能够停止使用阑尾造口术/盲肠造口术管。

方法

回顾了2012年至2021年间在两家机构接受阑尾造口术或盲肠造口术管置入的患者。联系患者或其父母/监护人以完成一项调查。将临床数据的汇总统计制成表格,并通过卡方分析评估相关性。

结果

共纳入165例患者,其中男性92例(55.8%)。完成了82份(49.7%)调查问卷。大多数患者(51.5%)表现为大便失禁;38例(23.3%)表现为便秘。更多患者的主要潜在诊断为肛门直肠畸形(39.4%),其次是功能性便秘(21.2%)、先天性巨结肠(18.8%)和脊柱畸形(17.6%)。36例(21.8%)患者在随访时停止冲洗,最常见的原因是改用泻药(19%),其次是阑尾造口狭窄/梗阻/闭合(17%)、改用回肠造口术/结肠造口术(17%)和患者偏好(14%)。根据潜在诊断,患者停止冲洗的能力没有差异(p = 0.31)。大多数(84.1%)受访者“非常有可能”向其他诊断相似的儿童推荐顺行性灌肠,76.8%的受访者表示对手术“非常满意”。

结论

对于便秘和大便失禁的儿童,顺行性节制灌肠仍有很高的满意度;一些儿童可能能够停止使用顺行性灌肠,其机制多样,包括患者/家庭自行断奶与借助辅助手段和试用泻药。

研究类型

回顾性队列研究。

证据水平

III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验