Encisco Ellen M, Garza Ramiro, McNinch Neil L, Davis Carolyn, Rosen Nelson G, Rymeski Beth, Frischer Jason S, Garrison Aaron P, Huntington Justin T
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA; Colorectal Center, Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
The University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jan;60(1):161958. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161958. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
An option for medically refractory fecal incontinence and/or constipation is the antegrade continence enema (ACE). We investigated ACE usage and its perceptions, including whether patients were able to discontinue use of the appendicostomy/cecostomy tube.
Patients who underwent appendicostomy creation or cecostomy tube placement at two institutions between 2012 and 2021 were reviewed. Patients or parents/guardians were contacted for completion of a survey. Summary statistics for clinical data were tabulated and associations were evaluated with chi-square analysis.
A total of 165 patients were included, including 92 (55.8%) males. Eighty-two (49.7%) surveys were completed. Most patients (51.5%) presented with fecal incontinence; 38 (23.3%) presented with constipation. More patients had a primary underlying diagnosis of anorectal malformation (39.4%), followed by functional constipation (21.2%), Hirschsprung disease (18.8%), and spinal malformation (17.6%). Thirty-six (21.8%) patients discontinued flushes by time of contact, with switch to laxatives being the most common reason (19%), followed by appendicostomy stricture/obstruction/closure (17%), switch to ileostomy/colostomy (17%), and patient preference (14%). There was no difference in patients' ability to stop using flushes based on underlying diagnosis (p = 0.31). The majority (84.1%) of respondents were "very likely" to recommend antegrade enemas to other children with similar diagnosis and 76.8% reported being "very satisfied" that the operation was done.
There remains a high degree of satisfaction with antegrade continence enemas for children with constipation and fecal incontinence; some children may be able to stop using antegrade enemas with varied mechanisms including patient/family weaning versus with assistance and laxative trials.
Retrospective cohort study.
III.
对于药物治疗无效的大便失禁和/或便秘,一种选择是顺行性节制灌肠(ACE)。我们调查了ACE的使用情况及其相关看法,包括患者是否能够停止使用阑尾造口术/盲肠造口术管。
回顾了2012年至2021年间在两家机构接受阑尾造口术或盲肠造口术管置入的患者。联系患者或其父母/监护人以完成一项调查。将临床数据的汇总统计制成表格,并通过卡方分析评估相关性。
共纳入165例患者,其中男性92例(55.8%)。完成了82份(49.7%)调查问卷。大多数患者(51.5%)表现为大便失禁;38例(23.3%)表现为便秘。更多患者的主要潜在诊断为肛门直肠畸形(39.4%),其次是功能性便秘(21.2%)、先天性巨结肠(18.8%)和脊柱畸形(17.6%)。36例(21.8%)患者在随访时停止冲洗,最常见的原因是改用泻药(19%),其次是阑尾造口狭窄/梗阻/闭合(17%)、改用回肠造口术/结肠造口术(17%)和患者偏好(14%)。根据潜在诊断,患者停止冲洗的能力没有差异(p = 0.31)。大多数(84.1%)受访者“非常有可能”向其他诊断相似的儿童推荐顺行性灌肠,76.8%的受访者表示对手术“非常满意”。
对于便秘和大便失禁的儿童,顺行性节制灌肠仍有很高的满意度;一些儿童可能能够停止使用顺行性灌肠,其机制多样,包括患者/家庭自行断奶与借助辅助手段和试用泻药。
回顾性队列研究。
III级。