NeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Nov;60(9):6291-6299. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16548. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
To assess reticulospinal tract excitability, high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to elicit ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). However, there is no consensus on robust and valid methods for use in human studies. The present study proposes a standardized method for eliciting and analysing iMEPs in the biceps brachii. Twenty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes recorded contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) from the right and iMEPs from the left biceps brachii. A dynamic preacher curl task was used with ~15% of the subject's one-repetition maximum load. The protocol included maximal compound action potential (M-max) determination of the right biceps brachii muscle, TMS hotspot determination, and four sets of five repetitions where 100% stimulator output was delivered at an elbow angle of 110° of flexion. We normalized cMEP amplitude by M-max (% M-max) and iMEP by cMEP amplitude ratio (ICAR). Clear iMEPs above background EMG were observed in 21 subjects (88%, ICAR = .31 ± .19). Good-to-excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .795-1.000) and low bias (.01-.08 mV and .60-1.11 ms) were demonstrated when comparing two different analysis methods (i.e. fixed time-window vs. manual onset detection) to determine the cMEP and iMEP amplitude and latency, respectively. Most subjects demonstrated clear iMEPs above background EMG triggered at a pre-determined joint angle during a light-load dynamic preacher curl exercise. Similar results were obtained when comparing a single-trial manual identification of iMEP and a semi-automated time-window data analysis approach.
为了评估网状脊髓束兴奋性,已经使用高强度经颅磁刺激(TMS)来引出同侧运动诱发电位(iMEP)。然而,在人类研究中,尚没有关于稳健且有效的方法的共识。本研究提出了一种标准化方法,用于在肱二头肌中引出和分析 iMEP。24 名健康的年轻成年人参与了这项研究。肌电图(EMG)电极记录了右侧的对侧运动诱发电位(cMEP)和左侧肱二头肌的同侧运动诱发电位(iMEP)。使用约 15%的受试者 1 次重复最大负荷的动态牧师卷发任务。该方案包括确定右侧肱二头肌的最大复合动作电位(M-max)、TMS 热点确定以及 4 组 5 次重复,在 110°弯曲的肘部角度下以 100%刺激器输出进行。我们通过最大复合动作电位(M-max)(% M-max)归一化 cMEP 幅度,通过 cMEP 幅度比(ICAR)归一化 iMEP。在 21 名受试者中(88%,ICAR=0.31±0.19)观察到明显高于背景 EMG 的 iMEP。当比较两种不同的分析方法(即固定时间窗与手动起始检测)以分别确定 cMEP 和 iMEP 幅度和潜伏期时,显示出良好到极好的一致性(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.795-1.000)和低偏差(0.01-0.08 mV 和 0.60-1.11 ms)。在轻负荷动态牧师卷发运动中,大多数受试者在预定的关节角度下触发明显高于背景 EMG 的 iMEP。当比较单次手动识别 iMEP 和半自动时间窗数据分析方法时,得到了类似的结果。