• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺叶下切除与肺叶切除术后肺癌患者死于其他疾病的风险

Risk of Death From Other Diseases in Lung Cancer Patients After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy.

作者信息

Nakao Masayuki, Suzuki Ayumi, Ichinose Junji, Matsuura Yosuke, Okumura Sakae, Mun Mingyon

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;131(3):380-387. doi: 10.1002/jso.27927. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1002/jso.27927
PMID:39359126
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A recent Japanese phase three clinical trial for lung cancer suggested a possible advantage of segmentectomy over lobectomy in terms of death from other diseases. This study aimed to compare the risk of death from other diseases based on surgical procedures in lung cancer patients without recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2121 patients without disease recurrence after curative resection for lung cancer at our institution. Patient characteristics and overall survival were compared between sublobar resection and lobectomy.

RESULTS

The sublobar group (n = 595) had a significantly higher proportion of women, non-smokers, patients without comorbidities, patients with a history of other cancers, and patients with earlier-staged disease when compared with the lobectomy group (n = 1526). The overall survival was significantly longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.0034). After adjusting for background characteristics in an analysis of 488 patients, the overall survival had a trend to be longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that the risk of death from other diseases was potentially higher after lobectomy than after sublobar resection. Although several clinical factors could influence the results, these results may support the benefit of sublobar resection, assuming that the curability of both procedures is similar.

摘要

背景与目的

近期一项针对肺癌的日本三期临床试验表明,在因其他疾病导致的死亡方面,肺段切除术可能优于肺叶切除术。本研究旨在比较肺癌患者在无复发情况下基于手术方式的其他疾病死亡风险。

方法

我们回顾性分析了本机构2121例肺癌根治性切除术后无疾病复发的患者。比较了亚肺叶切除组和肺叶切除组的患者特征及总生存期。

结果

与肺叶切除组(n = 1526)相比,亚肺叶切除组(n = 595)女性、不吸烟者、无合并症患者、有其他癌症病史患者及疾病分期较早患者的比例显著更高。亚肺叶切除组的总生存期显著长于肺叶切除组(p = 0.0034)。在对488例患者进行背景特征调整分析后,亚肺叶切除组的总生存期有长于肺叶切除组的趋势(p = 0.071)。

结论

我们的结果表明,肺叶切除术后因其他疾病导致的死亡风险可能高于亚肺叶切除术后。尽管有几个临床因素可能影响结果,但假设两种手术的治愈率相似,这些结果可能支持亚肺叶切除的益处。

相似文献

1
Risk of Death From Other Diseases in Lung Cancer Patients After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy.肺叶下切除与肺叶切除术后肺癌患者死于其他疾病的风险
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;131(3):380-387. doi: 10.1002/jso.27927. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Long-Term Results for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: Comparing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection.临床ⅠA 期肺癌的长期结果:肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):375-381. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.049. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
Choice of surgical procedure - lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection - for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A population-based study.手术方式选择 - 肺叶切除术、节段切除术或楔形切除术 - 用于 T1-2N0M0 期小细胞肺癌患者:一项基于人群的研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Apr;10(4):593-600. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12943. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
4
Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Sublobar Resection and Lobectomy for cT1N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma.亚肺叶切除术与肺叶切除术治疗 cT1N0 肺腺癌患者生存的倾向性匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;27(3):703-715. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07974-9. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
5
Differential efficacy of segmentectomy and wedge resection in sublobar resection compared to lobectomy for solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.亚肺叶切除(包括肺段切除术和楔形切除术)与肺叶切除术治疗以实性成分为主的ⅠA 期肺癌的疗效差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1159-1171. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000896.
6
Better survival with lobectomy versus sublobar resection in patients with hypermetabolic c-stage IA lung cancer on positron emission tomography/computed tomography.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描显示高代谢 cT1aN0M0 期肺癌患者行解剖性肺叶切除术比亚肺叶切除术有更好的生存获益。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;66(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae347.
7
Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm.外科医生更倾向于对小于 3cm 的 I 期非小细胞肺癌行亚肺叶切除术。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Apr;11(4):907-917. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13336. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
8
Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in solid-type, clinical stage IA, non-small cell lung cancer.实性型临床ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌的肺叶下切除与肺叶切除术对比
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 16;12:215. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-215.
9
Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for small (2 cm or less) non-small cell lung cancers.肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术治疗 2cm 及以下的小细胞肺癌。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1819-23; discussion 1824-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.099. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
10
Long term outcomes after lobar versus sublobar resection for patients with Non-Small cell lung Cancer: Systematic review and individual patient data Meta-Analysis.肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的长期结果:系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2024 Sep;195:107929. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107929. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Impact of Heart Failure on the Postoperative Outcomes for Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection by Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 2016-2020 HCUP-NIS Data.心力衰竭对接受电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术和肺段切除术的肺癌患者术后结局的临床影响:基于2016 - 2020年医疗成本和利用项目 - 国家住院患者样本(HCUP - NIS)数据的倾向评分匹配分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2025 Feb 20;19:11795549251319583. doi: 10.1177/11795549251319583. eCollection 2025.