如何对神经病学教育领域的稿件进行同行评审。
How to Peer Review a Neurology Education Manuscript.
作者信息
Di Luca Daniel G, Lazar Steven M, Gupta Preeta, Lukban Marie Charmaine S, Crowson Cole, Albert Dara V F, Moeller Jeremy J, Fernandez Andres, Southerland Andrew M, London Zachary
机构信息
From the Department of Neurology (D.G.D.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience (S.M.L.), Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Department of Neurology (P.G., Z.L.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Philippine General Hospital (M.C.S.L.), Manilla; Department of Neurology (C.C.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Division of Neurology (D.V.F.A.), Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital/The Ohio State University, Columbus; and Department of Neurology (J.J.M., A.F., A.M.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
出版信息
Neurol Educ. 2023 Nov 6;2(4):e200099. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200099. eCollection 2023 Dec 22.
Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and suitability of manuscripts for publication. Neurology education research differs from biomedical clinical research in several ways. These differences encompass specific paradigms, the use of theoretical frameworks, and different methodological approaches. Despite the high number of studies and journal publications on neurology education, there is a dearth of resources and guidance on how to perform a formal review on this specific literature. This article aims to review the distinctive features of neurology education from clinical research while proposing an organizational framework and model for performing peer reviews of papers focused on neurology education.
同行评审是科学研究中的一个重要过程，可确保手稿在发表方面的全面性、准确性和适用性。神经学教育研究在几个方面不同于生物医学临床研究。这些差异包括特定的范式、理论框架的使用以及不同的方法论方法。尽管关于神经学教育的研究和期刊出版物数量众多，但在如何对这一特定文献进行正式评审方面，资源和指导却很匮乏。本文旨在回顾神经学教育与临床研究的不同特征，同时提出一个组织框架和模型，用于对专注于神经学教育的论文进行同行评审。
Zotero 插件