Liu Shirelle X, Harris Andrew C, Gewirtz Jonathan C
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;17:1462769. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1462769. eCollection 2024.
Substance use disorder (SUD) represents a large and growing global health problem. Despite the strong addictive potency of drugs of abuse, only a minority of those exposed develop SUDs. While certain life experiences (e.g., childhood trauma) may increase subsequent vulnerability to SUDs, mechanisms underlying these effects are not yet well understood. Given the chronic and relapsing nature of SUDs, and the length of time that can elapse between prior life events and subsequent drug exposure, changes in SUD vulnerability almost certainly involve long-term epigenetic dysregulation. To validate this idea, functional effects of specific epigenetic modifications in brain regions mediating reinforcement learning (e.g., nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex) have been investigated in a variety of animal models of SUDs. In addition, the effects of epigenetic modifications produced by prior life experiences on subsequent SUD vulnerability have been studied, but mostly in a correlational manner. Here, we review how epigenetic mechanisms impact SUD-related behavior in animal models and summarize our understanding of the relationships among life experiences, epigenetic regulation, and future vulnerability to SUDs. Despite variations in study design, epigenetic modifications that most consistently affect SUD-related behavior are those that produce predominantly unidirectional effects on gene regulation, such as DNA methylation and histone phosphorylation. Evidence explicitly linking environmentally induced epigenetic modifications to subsequent SUD-related behavior is surprisingly sparse. We conclude by offering several directions for future research to begin to address this critical research gap.
物质使用障碍(SUD)是一个日益严重的全球性重大健康问题。尽管滥用药物具有很强的成瘾性,但只有少数接触过这些药物的人会患上物质使用障碍。虽然某些生活经历(如童年创伤)可能会增加日后患物质使用障碍的易感性,但其潜在机制尚未完全明确。鉴于物质使用障碍具有慢性和复发性的特点,以及先前生活事件与随后药物接触之间可能间隔较长时间,物质使用障碍易感性的变化几乎肯定涉及长期的表观遗传失调。为了验证这一观点,在各种物质使用障碍动物模型中,研究了介导强化学习的脑区(如伏隔核、前额叶皮质)中特定表观遗传修饰的功能效应。此外,还研究了先前生活经历产生的表观遗传修饰对后续物质使用障碍易感性的影响,但大多是相关性研究。在此,我们综述表观遗传机制如何影响动物模型中与物质使用障碍相关的行为,并总结我们对生活经历、表观遗传调控以及未来物质使用障碍易感性之间关系的理解。尽管研究设计存在差异,但最一致地影响与物质使用障碍相关行为的表观遗传修饰是那些对基因调控产生主要单向效应的修饰,如DNA甲基化和组蛋白磷酸化。将环境诱导的表观遗传修饰与随后与物质使用障碍相关行为明确联系起来的证据出奇地稀少。我们通过为未来研究提供几个方向来结束本文,以开始填补这一关键的研究空白。