Hagege Ouriel, Brevet Pauline, Gerard Baptiste, Duhamel Elise, Mihailescu Sorina-Dana, Alcaix Didier, Weber Anne-Joëlle, Marcelli Christian, Grosjean Julien, Varin Rémi, Lequerré Thierry, Vittecoq Olivier
Department of Rheumatology & CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University, CHU de Rouen, France.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Rouen University, CHU de Rouen, France.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;43(1):87-95. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/6cxcaq. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Despite significant savings with biosimilars, their negative perception can lead to the occurrence of a nocebo effect (NE), therefore we aimed to quantify the NE in inflammatory rheumatism after switching from adalimumab or etanercept originators to biosimilars.
This retrospective study was conducted in 4 hospitals in Normandy, France between January 2018 and July 2022. The study included patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis in remission under adalimumab or etanercept originators before switching to biosimilars. The occurrence of a NE was considered in patients who did not maintain biosimilars at 12 months and who presented a subjective adverse event (AE). A comparative analysis of the quantitative data collected before and after switching was performed. The AE that led to biosimilar discontinuation was identified. Additional analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for the occurrence of a NE.
Among 183 patients included,13.1% presented a NE. Objective AEs were observed, including rheumatism reactivation (15.3%), intolerance (8.2%), infection (1.6%) and allergic reactions (0.5%). Morning stiffness duration was significantly different before and after the switch in the spondyloarthritis group (p=0.01). No risk factors were associated with the occurrence of a NE within the limits of the studied parameters.
The occurrence of a NE after switching to a biosimilar remains acceptable. It appears less frequent when the switch is supervised by the practitioner rather than being systematic (up to 33% in some countries). A shared medical decision seems to be essential in a subset of patients, which remains to be defined.
尽管生物类似药能显著节省费用,但其负面认知可能导致出现反安慰剂效应(NE),因此我们旨在量化从阿达木单抗或依那西普原研药转换为生物类似药后,炎症性风湿病患者中的反安慰剂效应。
这项回顾性研究于2018年1月至2022年7月在法国诺曼底的4家医院进行。该研究纳入了在转换为生物类似药之前,使用阿达木单抗或依那西普原研药病情缓解的类风湿关节炎或脊柱关节炎患者。未在12个月内持续使用生物类似药且出现主观不良事件(AE)的患者被视为发生了反安慰剂效应。对转换前后收集的定量数据进行了比较分析。确定了导致停用生物类似药的不良事件。还进行了额外分析以确定反安慰剂效应发生的潜在风险因素。
在纳入的183例患者中,13.1%出现了反安慰剂效应。观察到了客观不良事件,包括风湿病复发(15.3%)、不耐受(8.2%)、感染(1.6%)和过敏反应(0.5%)。脊柱关节炎组转换前后晨僵持续时间有显著差异(p = 0.01)。在所研究参数范围内,没有风险因素与反安慰剂效应的发生相关。
转换为生物类似药后反安慰剂效应的发生仍可接受。当转换由医生监督而非常规进行时(在某些国家高达33%),其出现频率似乎较低。在一部分患者中,共同的医疗决策似乎至关重要,这部分患者仍有待确定。