Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26(12):5942-5949. doi: 10.1111/dom.15968. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
To compare the effects of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) on residual hyperglycaemia in Chinese people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on prior basal insulin (BI) therapy ± oral antidiabetic drugs in the LixiLan-L-CN study (NCT03798080).
In this post hoc analysis, residual hyperglycaemia (i.e. HbA1c ≥ 7.0% [≥ 53 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] < 7.0 mmol/L) were assessed over 30 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at week 30 in participants with baseline residual hyperglycaemia, including changes from baseline in HbA1c, FPG, 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) and daily BI dose, the proportion of participants with HbA1c less than 7.0% (< 53 mmol/mol) and FPG less than 7.0 mmol/L and the incidence of hypoglycaemia.
Of 421 participants, 124 (29.5%) had baseline residual hyperglycaemia (iGlarLixi, n = 64 [31.7%]; iGlar, n = 60 [29.1%]). At week 30, the residual hyperglycaemia rate decreased to 7.0% with iGlarLixi and increased to 43.3% with iGlar. Among participants with baseline residual hyperglycaemia, a greater proportion achieved both HbA1c and FPG targets at week 30 with iGlarLixi versus iGlar (43.8% vs. 16.7%), and iGlarLixi provided greater reductions in HbA1c (least squares mean [LSM] difference, -0.9% [-9.4 mmol/mol]) and 2-hour PPG (LSM difference, -4.7 mmol/L; both P < .001). Daily BI dose and incidence of hypoglycaemia were similar in the two groups.
The findings of this post hoc analysis suggest that iGlarLixi had greater benefits than iGlar in reducing the rate of residual hyperglycaemia over 30 weeks in Chinese people with suboptimally controlled T2D on prior BI-based therapy.
比较利司那肽双胰岛素注射液(iGlarLixi)与甘精胰岛素 100 U/mL(iGlar)在既往接受基础胰岛素(BI)联合口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的血糖控制不佳的中国 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中对残余高血糖的影响,在 LixiLan-L-CN 研究(NCT03798080)中。
在这项事后分析中,评估了 30 周内残余高血糖(即 HbA1c≥7.0%(≥53mmol/mol)和空腹血糖[FPG]<7.0mmol/L)。在基线存在残余高血糖的参与者中,在第 30 周评估了结局,包括 HbA1c、FPG、餐后 2 小时血糖(PPG)和每日 BI 剂量的变化,HbA1c<7.0%(<53mmol/mol)和 FPG<7.0mmol/L 的参与者比例,以及低血糖的发生率。
在 421 名参与者中,有 124 名(29.5%)基线存在残余高血糖(iGlarLixi,n=64[31.7%];iGlar,n=60[29.1%])。在第 30 周时,iGlarLixi 使残余高血糖率降至 7.0%,而 iGlar 使残余高血糖率升至 43.3%。在基线存在残余高血糖的参与者中,iGlarLixi 较 iGlar 更能实现 HbA1c 和 FPG 目标(43.8%比 16.7%),且 iGlarLixi 使 HbA1c 降低幅度更大(最小二乘均数[LSM]差异,-0.9%[-9.4mmol/mol])和 2 小时 PPG 降低幅度更大(LSM 差异,-4.7mmol/L;均 P<0.001)。两组间每日 BI 剂量和低血糖发生率相似。
这项事后分析的结果表明,在既往接受 BI 为基础的治疗血糖控制不佳的中国 T2D 患者中,与 iGlar 相比,iGlarLixi 在 30 周内降低残余高血糖的发生率方面具有更大的优势。