Department of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):5031-5038. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05602-0. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints is a salvage procedure that has been used successfully for years. Treatment options include internal procedures and external procedures. Retrograde intramedullary nailing is considered a safe procedure with a high degree of stability and comfort. Nevertheless, there are cases in which this internal arthrodesis fails and another procedure must be considered. Ilizarov fixator treatment could be a solution for those patients in whom intramedullary nailing has failed. Even if it means another surgical revision - is it possible to finally achieve consolidation with this method?
In this single-center, retrospective study all documents of patients who underwent tibiotalar and subtalar joints fusion using the Ilizarov external fixator at our institution from 2003 to 2023 as secondary treatment after frustrated first arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women), with an average age of 55.7 (standard deviation (SD) 8.7, range 34-75) years were included.
On average, 1.7 (SD 1.3, range 1-6) arthrodesis attempt were performed before final Ilizarov fixator arthrodesis. The average time spent in the Ilizarov fixator was 19 (SD 4, range 14-29) weeks. In seven cases (36.8%), both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints received bony consolidation in the end.
If patients have undergone fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with a retrograde nail and this fails, it is difficult to achieve complete consolidation in the further course. A further attempt at arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator is possible, but the overall results are also poor. This procedure must therefore be seen as a last resort before amputation.
距下关节和跗骨间关节融合术是一种已成功应用多年的挽救性手术。治疗方案包括内固定和外固定。逆行髓内钉固定被认为是一种安全的手术方法,具有高度的稳定性和舒适度。然而,在某些情况下,这种内固定融合会失败,需要考虑其他方法。伊利扎罗夫固定器治疗可能是那些髓内钉固定失败的患者的解决方案。即使这意味着需要再次手术修正——是否有可能通过这种方法最终实现愈合?
在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们回顾了 2003 年至 2023 年期间,我院对因初次采用髓内钉固定融合失败后,采用伊利扎罗夫外固定器治疗的距下关节和跗骨间关节融合的所有患者的病历资料。共纳入 19 名患者(17 名男性,2 名女性),平均年龄为 55.7 岁(标准差 8.7,范围 34-75 岁)。
平均在最终采用伊利扎罗夫固定器融合之前,尝试了 1.7 次(标准差 1.3,范围 1-6)融合术。患者平均使用伊利扎罗夫固定器 19 周(标准差 4 周,范围 14-29 周)。最终有 7 例(36.8%)患者实现了距下关节和跗骨间关节的骨性融合。
如果患者接受过逆行钉固定的距下关节和跗骨间关节融合术,但融合失败,那么在后续治疗中很难实现完全愈合。采用伊利扎罗夫固定器进行进一步融合尝试是可行的,但总体结果也不理想。因此,在考虑截肢之前,该手术应被视为最后的选择。