• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为成本分摊函数的处方药需求。

The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing.

作者信息

Leibowitz A, Manning W G, Newhouse J P

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(10):1063-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90161-3.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(85)90161-3
PMID:3936186
Abstract

This paper estimates how cost-sharing affects the use of prescription drugs. The data for this analysis are derived from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment (HIE), a randomized controlled trial that randomly assigned participants to insurance plans with varying coinsurance rates and deductibles. Therefore, the cost-sharing they faced was independent of their health and demographic characteristics. The paper used HIE data from four sites to estimate how drug expenditures vary by insurance plan, and to compare the plan response for drugs with that for all ambulatory expenses. The findings show that: (1) individuals with more generous insurance buy more prescription drugs; (2) the cost-sharing response for drugs is similar to the response for all ambulatory medical services; (3) the Dayton, Ohio site had significantly greater drug expenditures per capita than the other sites studied and a significantly higher proportion of drugs sold by physicians; and (4) the proportion of brand-name drugs among all drugs purchased in pharmacies was not a function of insurance plan. In the Dayton, Ohio site, a significantly higher proportion of the drugs purchased in pharmacies were brand-name rather than generic.

摘要

本文估计了费用分担如何影响处方药的使用。该分析的数据源自兰德健康保险实验(HIE),这是一项随机对照试验,将参与者随机分配到具有不同共保率和免赔额的保险计划中。因此,他们面临的费用分担与他们的健康和人口特征无关。本文使用来自四个地点的HIE数据来估计药品支出如何因保险计划而异,并比较药品的计划反应与所有门诊费用的反应。研究结果表明:(1)拥有更慷慨保险的个人购买更多处方药;(2)药品的费用分担反应与所有门诊医疗服务的反应相似;(3)俄亥俄州代顿市的人均药品支出明显高于其他研究地点,且医生销售的药品比例明显更高;(4)药店购买的所有药品中品牌药的比例与保险计划无关。在俄亥俄州代顿市,药店购买的药品中品牌药的比例明显高于非专利药。

相似文献

1
The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing.作为成本分摊函数的处方药需求。
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(10):1063-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90161-3.
2
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.雇主药物福利计划与处方药支出
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
3
The association of insurance type with costs of dispensed drugs.保险类型与配药费用的关联。
Inquiry. 1998 Spring;35(1):23-35.
4
The effects of drug subsidies on out-of-pocket prescription drug expenditures by seniors: regional evidence from Canada.药物补贴对老年人自付处方药支出的影响:来自加拿大的区域证据。
J Health Econ. 2002 Sep;21(5):805-26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00012-7.
5
Pharmacy Benefit Managers, Brand-Name Drug Prices, and Patient Cost Sharing.药品福利管理公司、品牌药价格与患者费用分担
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 20;168(6):436-437. doi: 10.7326/M17-2506. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Substitution between prescribed and over-the-counter medications.处方药与非处方药之间的替代。
Med Care. 1989 Jan;27(1):85-94. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198901000-00008.
7
The cost of medicine.药品成本。
West J Med. 1990 Jan;152(1):75-6.
8
Impact of multitiered copayments on the use and cost of prescription drugs among Medicare beneficiaries.多层级共付额对医疗保险受益人的处方药使用及费用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr;43(2):478-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00774.x.
9
Changes in Consumer Cost-Sharing for Health Plans Sold in the ACA's Insurance Marketplaces, 2015 to 2016.2015年至2016年在《平价医疗法案》保险市场上销售的健康保险计划中消费者成本分摊的变化
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 May;11:1-14.
10
The prescription-drug problem.处方药问题。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):790. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200203143461102.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of removing prescription co-payments on the use of costly health services: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.取消处方药共付额对昂贵医疗服务使用的影响:一项实用随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09011-0.
2
The effect of pharmaceutical co-payment increase on the use of social assistance-A natural experiment study.药品共付额增加对社会救助使用的影响——一项自然实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0250305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250305. eCollection 2021.
3
Effects of Guideline and Formulary Changes on Statin Prescribing in the Veterans Affairs.
指南与处方集变更对退伍军人事务部他汀类药物处方的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec;52(6):1996-2017. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12788.
4
Discussing Out-of-Pocket Expenses During Clinical Appointments: An Observational Study of Patient-Psychiatrist Interactions.临床预约期间讨论自付费用:一项关于患者与精神科医生互动的观察性研究
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jun 1;68(6):610-617. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600275. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Assessing outcomes of enhanced chronic disease care through patient education and a value-based formulary study (ACCESS)-study protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomized trial.通过患者教育和基于价值的处方研究评估强化慢性病护理的结果(ACCESS)——一项2×2析因随机试验的研究方案
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 26;11(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0491-6.
6
Medication Nonadherence: The Role of Cost, Community, and Individual Factors.药物治疗不依从性:成本、社区和个体因素的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1511-1533. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12547. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Out-of-pocket expenditures for pharmaceuticals: lessons from the Austrian household budget survey.药品自付费用:来自奥地利家庭预算调查的经验教训。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 May;18(4):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0797-y. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
8
Out-of-pocket expenditure by private households for dental services - empirical evidence from Austria.私营部门为牙科服务支付的自付费用-来自奥地利的实证证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0087-5. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
9
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
10
Estimating the marginal effect of socioeconomic factors on the demand of specialty drugs.评估社会经济因素对专科药物需求的边际效应。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Sep 25;7(2):28-37. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p28.