• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺经直肠活检的抗生素预防:呼吁使用磷霉素。

Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate: A Plea for Fosfomycin.

作者信息

Spachmann Philipp Julian, Witt Daniel, Breyer Johannes, Denzinger Stefan, Burger Maximilian, Vergho Daniel Claudius, Otto Wolfgang, Schnabel Marco Julius

机构信息

Departement of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Urologie Landau Isar and Urologie Plattling, Plattling, Germany.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2025;109(2):146-150. doi: 10.1159/000541798. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1159/000541798
PMID:39362202
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

According to guidelines, transrectal random biopsy of the prostate (TRBP) is performed under antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). Fosfomycin-trometamol (FOS) is not approved in Germany, but TRBP as indication was listed in the product information falsely. The aim was to investigate infectious complications of TRBP under FOS as a single dose.

METHODS

All TRBPs under FOS 3,000 mg as a single dose between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, at a university institution were recorded. 357 patients (41-85 years old, median 66) were included. 243 received first TRBP, 321 TRBP were MRI-fusionated. 10-22 cores were taken (median 14). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.1-1224 ng/mL (median 7.7 ng/mL), prostate volume 5-263 mL (median 50 mL). Analysis was performed using Chi square test or Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and t test.

RESULTS

Four patients suffered an infection (1.1%), without significant difference according to age (p = 0.849), PSA (p = 0.957), number of cores (p = 0.905), and increase in volume (p = 0.456). Limiting is the retrospective character.

CONCLUSION

The complication rate was 1.1%, and FOS single dose therefore represents sufficient AP for TRBP in this collective. FOS as a single dose should be reevaluated in a prospective study to obtain approval in Germany for this indication.

摘要

引言

根据指南,经直肠前列腺随机活检(TRBP)在抗生素预防(AP)下进行。磷霉素氨丁三醇(FOS)在德国未获批准,但产品说明书中错误地将TRBP列为适应症。目的是研究单剂量FOS下TRBP的感染并发症。

方法

记录了2020年7月1日至2021年6月30日在一所大学机构进行的所有单剂量3000mg FOS下的TRBP。纳入357例患者(41 - 85岁,中位年龄66岁)。243例接受首次TRBP,321例TRBP进行了MRI融合。取材10 - 22个核心(中位14个)。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为0.1 - 1224 ng/mL(中位7.7 ng/mL),前列腺体积5 - 263 mL(中位50 mL)。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验、Mann - Whitney U检验和t检验进行分析。

结果

4例患者发生感染(1.1%),根据年龄(p = 0.849)、PSA(p = 0.957)、核心数量(p = 0.905)和体积增加(p = 0.456)无显著差异。局限性在于研究具有回顾性。

结论

并发症发生率为1.1%,因此单剂量FOS对该群体的TRBP而言是足够的抗生素预防。应在前瞻性研究中重新评估单剂量FOS,以便在德国获得该适应症的批准。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate: A Plea for Fosfomycin.前列腺经直肠活检的抗生素预防:呼吁使用磷霉素。
Urol Int. 2025;109(2):146-150. doi: 10.1159/000541798. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Two Fosfomycin Regimens as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomised Study.两种磷霉素方案作为经直肠前列腺活检抗菌预防用药的疗效与安全性:一项随机研究
Urol Int. 2019;103(4):433-438. doi: 10.1159/000502851. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Efficacy and safety of fosfomycin-trometamol in the prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Prospective randomized comparison with ciprofloxacin.磷霉素氨丁三醇预防经直肠前列腺活检的有效性和安全性。与环丙沙星的前瞻性随机对照比较。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(6):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of Single and Prolonged Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检后单剂与长程氟喹诺酮类预防用药的比较及感染性并发症的危险因素。
Balkan Med J. 2018 Sep 21;35(5):373-377. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2018.0477. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Complication Rate After Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Fosfomycin Versus Fluorochinolones or β-lactam Antibiotics in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy: A Propensity Score-adjusted Analysis.接受前列腺活检的患者中,应用磷霉素与氟喹诺酮类或β-内酰胺类抗生素进行预防抗菌治疗的并发症发生率:倾向评分调整分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):370-375. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Use of fosfomycin as targeted antibiotic prophylaxis before prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study.在前列腺活检前使用磷霉素作为靶向抗生素预防:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Urol. 2019 Mar;26(3):391-397. doi: 10.1111/iju.13883. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Comparison of different regimens of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检中不同短期抗生素预防方案的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Mar;145:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.12.012. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Efficacy of fosfomycin compared to second generation cephalosporin flumarin as antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a single center retrospective study.磷霉素与第二代头孢菌素头孢替唑预防经直肠超声引导前列腺活检的疗效比较:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01391-7.
9
[Optimization of prevention of infectious complications during prostate biopsy].[前列腺活检期间感染性并发症预防的优化]
Urologiia. 2023 Dec(6):128-132.
10
Comparison of ciprofloxacin versus fosfomycin versus fosfomycin plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for preventing infections after transrectal prostate biopsy.比较环丙沙星、磷霉素与磷霉素联合复方磺胺甲噁唑预防经直肠前列腺活检后感染的疗效。
World J Urol. 2024 May 28;42(1):356. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05048-4.