• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有多级感知特征的钢琴演奏评估数据集。

Piano performance evaluation dataset with multilevel perceptual features.

作者信息

Park Jisoo, Kim Jongho, Park Jeong Mi, Choi Ahyeon, Li Wen-Syan, Park Jonghwa, Hwang Seung-Won

机构信息

Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.

Interdisciplinary Program in Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):23002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73810-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-73810-0
PMID:39362914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11450231/
Abstract

This study aims to build a comprehensive dataset that enables the automatic evaluation of piano performances. In real-world piano performance, especially within the realm of classical piano music, we encounter a vast spectrum of performance variations. The challenge lies in how to effectively evaluate these performances. We must consider three critical aspects: (1) It is essential to gauge how performers express the music and how listeners perceive the performance, rather than focusing on the compositional characteristics of the musical piece. (2) Beyond fundamental elements like pitch and duration, we must also embrace higher-level features such as interpretation. (3) Such evaluation should be done by experts to discern the nuanced performances. Regrettably, there exists no dataset that addresses these challenging evaluation tasks. Therefore, we introduce a pioneering dataset PercePiano, annotated by music experts, with more extensive features capable of representing these nuanced aspects effectively. It encapsulates piano performance with a wide range of perceptual features that are recognized by musicians. Our evaluation benchmark includes a novel metric designed to accommodate the inherent subjectivity of perception. Furthermore, we propose an enhanced baseline framework that grounds performance on score data, aligning model predictions with human perception. Harnessing the aligned features enhances the baseline performance and proves to be adaptable to various model structures. In conclusion, our research opens new possibilities for comprehensive piano performance evaluation.

摘要

本研究旨在构建一个能够对钢琴演奏进行自动评估的综合数据集。在现实世界的钢琴演奏中,尤其是在古典钢琴音乐领域,我们会遇到各种各样的演奏变化。挑战在于如何有效地评估这些演奏。我们必须考虑三个关键方面:(1)至关重要的是衡量演奏者如何表达音乐以及听众如何感知演奏,而不是关注音乐作品的作曲特征。(2)除了音高和时长等基本要素外,我们还必须纳入诸如诠释等更高层次的特征。(3)这种评估应由专家来进行,以辨别细微的演奏差异。遗憾的是,目前还没有一个数据集能够解决这些具有挑战性的评估任务。因此,我们引入了一个开创性的数据集PercePiano,由音乐专家进行注释,具有更广泛的特征,能够有效地代表这些细微的方面。它用音乐家认可的广泛感知特征封装了钢琴演奏。我们的评估基准包括一个旨在适应感知固有主观性的新颖指标。此外,我们提出了一个增强的基线框架,该框架基于乐谱数据进行性能评估,使模型预测与人类感知保持一致。利用对齐的特征可提高基线性能,并证明适用于各种模型结构。总之,我们的研究为全面的钢琴演奏评估开辟了新的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/a859c4ce6608/41598_2024_73810_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/981e77357ad2/41598_2024_73810_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/46b7ad5f19cf/41598_2024_73810_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/a859c4ce6608/41598_2024_73810_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/981e77357ad2/41598_2024_73810_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/46b7ad5f19cf/41598_2024_73810_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b3/11450231/a859c4ce6608/41598_2024_73810_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Piano performance evaluation dataset with multilevel perceptual features.具有多级感知特征的钢琴演奏评估数据集。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):23002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73810-0.
2
Reciprocal modulation of cognitive and emotional aspects in pianistic performances.钢琴演奏中认知和情感方面的相互调节。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024437. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
3
An evaluation of linear and non-linear models of expressive dynamics in classical piano and symphonic music.对古典钢琴和交响乐中表现性动态的线性与非线性模型的评估。
Mach Learn. 2017;106(6):887-909. doi: 10.1007/s10994-017-5631-y. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Getting into the musical zone: trait emotional intelligence and amount of practice predict flow in pianists.进入音乐区:特质情绪智力和练习量预测钢琴家的流畅度。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 22;4:853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00853. eCollection 2013.
5
Memory for musical surface.对音乐表层的记忆
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):401-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03197145.
6
Structural, functional, and perceptual differences in Heschl's gyrus and musical instrument preference.颞横回的结构、功能及感知差异与乐器偏好
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1060:387-94. doi: 10.1196/annals.1360.033.
7
NLP-based music processing for composer classification.基于自然语言处理的作曲风格分类研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40332-0.
8
Perception of Musical Tension in Cochlear Implant Listeners.人工耳蜗植入者对音乐紧张感的感知。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 20;13:987. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00987. eCollection 2019.
9
Construction and Application of a Piano Playing Pitch Recognition Model Based on Neural Network.基于神经网络的钢琴弹奏音高识别模型的构建与应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 17;2022:8431982. doi: 10.1155/2022/8431982. eCollection 2022.
10
Music Performance Anxiety: Can Expressive Writing Intervention Help?音乐表演焦虑:表达性写作干预能否有所帮助?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 16;11:1334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01334. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
2
Using listener-based perceptual features as intermediate representations in music information retrieval.在音乐信息检索中使用基于听众的感知特征作为中间表示。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Oct;136(4):1951-63. doi: 10.1121/1.4892767.
3
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
4
Performance comparison of Likert and binary formats of SF-36 version 1.6 across ECRHS II adults populations.SF-36 1.6版李克特量表和二分法格式在欧洲社区呼吸健康调查二期成年人群中的性能比较
Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10(6):478-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00203.x.