School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Dec;38(12):1658-1676. doi: 10.1177/02692155241268373. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors pertaining to neck pain from systematic reviews.
A search on PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL was performed on June 27, 2024. Additional grey literature searches were performed.
We conducted an umbrella review and included systematic reviews reporting the prognostic factors associated with non-specific or trauma-related neck pain and cervical radiculopathy. Prognostic factors were sorted according to the outcome predicted, the direction of the predicted outcome (worse, better, inconsistent), and the grade of evidence (Oxford Center of Evidence). The predicted outcomes were regrouped into five categories: pain, disability, work-related outcomes, quality of life, and poor outcomes (as "recovery"). Risk of bias analysis was performed with the ROBIS tool.
We retrieved 884 citations from three databases, read 39 full texts, and included 16 studies that met all selection criteria. From these studies, we extracted 44 prognostic factors restricted to non-specific neck pain, 47 for trauma-related neck pain, and one for cervical radiculopathy. We observed that among the prognostic factors, most were associated with characteristics of the condition, cognitive-emotional factors, or socio-environmental and lifestyle factors.
This study identified over 40 prognostic factors associated mainly with non-specific neck pain or trauma-related neck pain. We found that a majority were associated with worse outcomes and pertained to domains mainly involving cognitive-emotional factors, socio-environmental and lifestyle factors, and the characteristics of the condition to predict outcomes and potentially guide clinicians to tailor their interventions for people living with neck pain.
本研究旨在从系统评价中确定与颈部疼痛相关的预后因素。
于 2024 年 6 月 27 日在 PubMed、Scopus 和 CINAHL 上进行了搜索,并进行了额外的灰色文献搜索。
我们进行了伞式综述,纳入了报告与非特异性或创伤性颈部疼痛和颈椎神经根病相关的预后因素的系统评价。根据预测的结局、预测结局的方向(更糟、更好、不一致)以及证据等级(牛津证据中心)对预后因素进行分类。预测结果被重新分为五类:疼痛、残疾、工作相关结果、生活质量和不良结局(作为“恢复”)。使用 ROBIS 工具进行偏倚风险分析。
我们从三个数据库中检索到 884 条引文,阅读了 39 篇全文,并纳入了 16 项符合所有选择标准的研究。从这些研究中,我们提取了 44 个仅限于非特异性颈部疼痛的预后因素、47 个创伤性颈部疼痛的预后因素和 1 个颈椎神经根病的预后因素。我们观察到,在这些预后因素中,大多数与疾病的特征、认知-情绪因素或社会-环境和生活方式因素有关。
本研究确定了 40 多个主要与非特异性颈部疼痛或创伤性颈部疼痛相关的预后因素。我们发现,大多数与较差的结局相关,并与认知-情绪因素、社会-环境和生活方式因素以及疾病特征等主要涉及的领域有关,以预测结局并可能指导临床医生为颈部疼痛患者量身定制干预措施。