Vidoli Francesco, Pignataro Giacomo, Battiato Sebastiano, Guarnera Francesco, Guccio Calogero
University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society and Politics, Urbino, Italy.
University of Catania, Department of Economics and Business, Catania, Italy.
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00559-7.
Quality assessment in healthcare systems is challenging due to the multidimensional nature of healthcare services. This study evaluates the overall quality provided by hospitals using composite indicators under the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) approach, which determines the weights of the indicators with minimal assumptions. We used data from 2015-2020 for Italian Local Health Authorities (LHAs) for 21 outcome measures, applying various non-parametric methods to address aggregation and weighting challenges. Our results show that the BoD measures are robust and effectively capture the dynamics of the quality of LHA, even during external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This research highlights the importance of methodological choices in the construction of composite indicators and demonstrates the effectiveness of the BoD approach in providing a comprehensive measure of healthcare quality.
由于医疗服务具有多维度性质,医疗系统中的质量评估具有挑战性。本研究采用“疑罪从有”(BoD)方法,利用综合指标评估医院提供的整体质量,该方法在假设最少的情况下确定指标权重。我们使用了意大利地方卫生当局(LHA)2015 - 2020年的21项结果指标数据,应用各种非参数方法来应对汇总和加权方面的挑战。我们的结果表明,即使在COVID - 19大流行等外部冲击期间,BoD指标也很稳健,能有效捕捉LHA质量的动态变化。本研究强调了在构建综合指标时方法选择的重要性,并证明了BoD方法在提供医疗质量综合衡量方面的有效性。