Suppr超能文献

从使用动机到对健康和福祉的影响角度出发,对英国食品银行进行概念化:系统评价和定向内容分析。

Conceptualising food banking in the UK from drivers of use to impacts on health and wellbeing: A systematic review and directed content analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Appetite. 2024 Dec 1;203:107699. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107699. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Abstract

Food banks have become commonplace in the UK as an emergency response to food insecurity. However, food banks are not a long-term solution to food insecurity and are often not accessed by those in need. In the context of the cost-of-living crisis, and increased food insecurity, this systematic review applied market/government failure theory, voluntary failure theory, and Radimer et al.'s (1990) domains of food insecurity to explore three important aspects relevant to the food banking experience: the drivers of food bank use; the limitations of the current food bank model; and the impacts of the food banking model for food bank clients. Empirical, peer-reviewed articles written in English with a UK food bank context and reporting relevant data to these aspects were eligible for inclusion. In total, 221 titles were identified using four databases (Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, CINHAL Plus) in July 2022. The final sample of 41 articles (comprising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies), were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and analysed through directed content analysis. Market and government failures were widely reported to drive food bank use. Insufficiency, paternalism and particularism represented key limitations of the food bank model. Negative health and psychological impacts of food bank use were prominent, yet social impacts were largely positive. Consequently, new solutions are needed to promote positive health and psychological impacts for food bank clients in the UK. The application of these findings to other high-income countries experiencing food insecurity should be determined.

摘要

食物银行已成为英国应对粮食不安全的一种常见应急措施。然而,食物银行并不是解决粮食不安全问题的长期方案,而且往往无法惠及有需要的人。在生活成本危机加剧和粮食不安全加剧的背景下,本系统评价应用了市场/政府失灵理论、志愿失灵理论以及 Radimer 等人(1990 年)的粮食不安全领域,以探讨与食物银行体验相关的三个重要方面:使用食物银行的驱动因素;当前食物银行模式的局限性;以及食物银行模式对食物银行客户的影响。具有英国食物银行背景并报告与这些方面相关数据的英文同行评审实证文章符合纳入标准。总共使用四个数据库(Web of Science、SCOPUS、PubMed、CINHAL Plus)于 2022 年 7 月确定了 221 个标题。最终纳入的 41 篇文章样本(包括定性、定量和混合方法研究)采用混合方法评估工具进行了质量评估。通过定向内容分析对数据进行提取和分析。市场和政府失灵被广泛报道为推动食物银行使用的原因。不足、家长式作风和特殊性是食物银行模式的主要局限性。使用食物银行会带来负面的健康和心理影响,但社会影响则主要是积极的。因此,需要寻找新的解决方案,以促进英国食物银行客户的健康和心理产生积极影响。这些发现对其他面临粮食不安全问题的高收入国家的应用情况也应加以确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验