• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾细胞癌患者健康相关生活质量评估:一项范围综述

Health-related Quality of Life Assessment in Renal Cell Cancer: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Gross Franziska, Rasmussen Ida Marie Lind, Beisland Elisabeth Grov, Jorem Gøril Tvedten, Beisland Christian, Pappot Helle, Arraras Juan Ignacio, Pe Madeline, Holzner Bernhard, Wintner Lisa M

机构信息

University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Feb;8(1):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.007
PMID:39366818
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In oncology, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) play an increasing role in clinical trials, drug approval, and policy making. This scoping review aimed to identify and elaborate on HRQOL-focussed PROMs used in renal cell cancer (RCC) clinical trials.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for original peer-reviewed articles on clinical trials including RCC patients and using PROMs, published between 1950 and 2023. Prespecified trial characteristics and information on the PROMs used were extracted. Frequencies and proportions of categorical data, and ranges and medians of continuous variables were calculated.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 48 unique studies included, the majority followed a randomised controlled design (34, 71%) and evaluated systemic treatments (38, 79%). The trials used 27 different PROMs (max = 6, median = 2), of which only 4 (15%) were developed specifically for kidney cancer patients. Of the trials, 46% did not use any RCC-specific PROM. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) -15/19-item version, FKSI-Disease Related Symptoms, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) were the most frequently used questionnaires, with pain, ability to work, fatigue, worry, and sleep quality being the most commonly assessed issues.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A variety of PROMs are used in RCC patients, hindering interpretability across trials. The PROMs used differ in terms of both the domains assessed and how the issues are translated into questionnaire items. Though RCC-specific PROMs exist, these have flaws in terms of relevance to patients. To answer predefined relevant HRQOL research questions, revised RCC-specific PROMs and standardisation of their integration into clinical trials are warranted.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Researchers are more and more interested in the health-related quality of life of kidney cancer patients and use questionnaires to measure it. This review shows that there are many different health-related quality of life questionnaires that are used in different combinations in clinical trials for kidney cancer patients. This makes it very difficult to compare these study results and draw reliable conclusions for the actual clinical treatment. It was even found that some of the questionnaires used do not capture things that patients actually consider important (eg, emotional issues such as dealing with thoughts about cancer and depression). Therefore, more work needs to be done to develop questionnaires that ask what is really important to kidney cancer patients' health-related quality of life. If these questionnaires are used in a consistent way in clinical trials, the results can be better compared. This will help treat kidney cancer patients in the best possible way.

摘要

背景与目的

在肿瘤学领域,用于衡量健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)在临床试验、药物审批及政策制定中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本范围综述旨在识别并详细阐述肾细胞癌(RCC)临床试验中使用的以HRQOL为重点的PROMs。

方法

系统检索MEDLINE、科学网、PsychINFO、Academic Search Elite、CINAHL、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找1950年至2023年间发表的关于包含RCC患者并使用PROMs的临床试验的同行评审原始文章。提取预先设定的试验特征及所使用PROMs的相关信息。计算分类数据的频率和比例,以及连续变量的范围和中位数。

主要发现与局限性

在纳入的48项独特研究中,大多数采用随机对照设计(34项,71%)并评估全身治疗(38项,79%)。这些试验使用了27种不同的PROMs(最多6种,中位数为2种),其中只有4种(15%)是专门为肾癌患者开发的。在这些试验中,46%未使用任何RCC特异性PROM。欧洲生活质量五维度量表(EQ-5D)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)、癌症治疗功能评估-肾脏症状指数(FKSI)-15/19项版本、FKSI-疾病相关症状量表以及癌症治疗功能评估-通用量表(FACT-G)是最常用的问卷,疼痛、工作能力、疲劳、担忧和睡眠质量是最常评估的问题。

结论与临床意义

RCC患者使用了多种PROMs,这妨碍了不同试验间结果的解释。所使用的PROMs在评估领域以及问题转化为问卷项目的方式上均存在差异。尽管存在RCC特异性PROMs,但在与患者的相关性方面存在缺陷。为回答预先设定的相关HRQOL研究问题,有必要修订RCC特异性PROMs并将其纳入临床试验的过程标准化。

患者总结

研究人员对肾癌患者的健康相关生活质量越来越感兴趣,并使用问卷进行测量。本综述表明,有许多不同的健康相关生活质量问卷,在肾癌患者的临床试验中以不同组合使用。这使得很难比较这些研究结果并为实际临床治疗得出可靠结论。甚至发现,一些使用的问卷未涵盖患者实际认为重要的方面(例如,应对癌症相关想法和抑郁等情绪问题)。因此,需要做更多工作来开发询问对肾癌患者健康相关生活质量真正重要内容的问卷。如果这些问卷在临床试验中以一致方式使用,结果将更具可比性。这将有助于以最佳方式治疗肾癌患者。

相似文献

1
Health-related Quality of Life Assessment in Renal Cell Cancer: A Scoping Review.肾细胞癌患者健康相关生活质量评估:一项范围综述
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Feb;8(1):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Standardising the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Localised Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review.规范局部前列腺癌患者报告结局测量的评估。系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
4
The EORTC QLU-C10D distinguished better between cancer patients and the general population than PROPr and EQ-5D-5L in a cross-sectional study.在一项横断面研究中,与PROPr和EQ-5D-5L相比,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心10项(EORTC QLU-C10D)能更好地区分癌症患者和普通人群。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;177:111592. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111592. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
Development of a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire intended to be used in conjunction with the general European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) in renal cell carcinoma patients.旨在与通用的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷(QLQ)联合用于肾细胞癌患者的疾病特异性健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)问卷的开发。
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(3):349-56. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1063776. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for advanced skin cancer patients.晚期皮肤癌患者报告结局测量的系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Aug;315(6):1473-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02479-0. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma given nivolumab versus everolimus in CheckMate 025: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.在CheckMate 025研究中,接受纳武单抗与依维莫司治疗的晚期肾细胞癌患者的生活质量:一项随机、开放标签的3期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30125-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
8
Assessing the quality of patient-reported outcome measurements for gynecological cancers: a systematic review.评估妇科癌症患者报告结局测量的质量:系统评价。
Future Oncol. 2023 Mar;19(9):663-678. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0111. Epub 2023 May 2.
9
Patient-reported Outcome Measurement and Reporting for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review.患者报告的晚期肾细胞癌患者结局测量和报告:系统文献回顾。
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):406-417. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
10
Health-related quality of life with belzutifan versus everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma (LITESPARK-005): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.贝佐替凡与依维莫司治疗晚期肾细胞癌的健康相关生活质量(LITESPARK-005):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验的患者报告结果
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Apr;26(4):491-502. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00032-4. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraindividual Perception of Open versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (PERCEPTION Trial): An Important Complementing Perspective to Randomized Controlled Trials.个体对开放性与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的感知(PERCEPTION试验):对随机对照试验的一个重要补充视角。
Urol Int. 2025 Apr 6:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000545583.