• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要但未接受急诊剖腹手术的老年患者特征:一项多中心队列研究。

Characterisation of older patients that require, but do not undergo, emergency laparotomy: a multicentre cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Ageing and Complex Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK.

Clinical Fellow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;133(5):973-982. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.009
PMID:39366845
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults (≥65 yr) account for the majority of emergency laparotomies in the UK and are well characterised with reported outcomes. In contrast, there is limited knowledge on those patients that require emergency laparotomy but do not undergo surgery (NoLaps).

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study (n=64 UK surgical centres) recruited 750 consecutive NoLap patients (February 15th - November 15th 2021, inclusive of a 90-day follow up period). Each patient was admitted to hospital with a surgical condition treatable by an emergency laparotomy (defined by The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) criteria), but a decision was made not to undergo surgery (NoLap).

RESULTS

NoLap patients were predominately female (452 patients, 60%), of advanced age (median age 83.0 yr, interquartile range 77.0-88.8), frail (523 patients, 70%), and had severe comorbidity (750 patients, 100%); 99% underwent CT scanning. The commonest diagnoses were perforation (26%), small bowel obstruction (17%), and ischaemic bowel (13%). The 90-day mortality was 79% and influencing factors were >80 yr, underweight BMI, elevated serum lactate or creatinine concentration. The majority of patients died in hospital (77%), with those with ischaemic bowel dying early. For the 21% of NoLap patients that survived to 90 days, 77% returned home with increased care requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports that the NoLap patient population present significant medical challenges because of their extreme levels of comorbidity, frailty, and physiology. Despite these complexities a fifth remained alive at 90 days. Further work is underway to explore this high-risk decision-making process.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN14556210.

摘要

背景

在英国,≥65 岁的老年人占急诊剖腹手术的大多数,并且其预后已有报道。相比之下,对于那些需要紧急剖腹手术但未接受手术的患者(NoLaps),人们知之甚少。

方法

一项多中心队列研究(纳入了 64 家英国外科中心)纳入了 750 例连续的 NoLap 患者(2021 年 2 月 15 日-11 月 15 日,包括 90 天的随访期)。每位患者因可通过急诊剖腹手术治疗的外科疾病入院(定义为国家急诊剖腹手术审核(NELA)标准),但决定不接受手术(NoLap)。

结果

NoLap 患者主要为女性(452 例,60%),年龄较大(中位数年龄 83.0 岁,四分位距 77.0-88.8),身体虚弱(523 例,70%),合并严重疾病(750 例,100%);99%接受了 CT 扫描。最常见的诊断为穿孔(26%)、小肠梗阻(17%)和肠缺血(13%)。90 天死亡率为 79%,影响因素为年龄>80 岁、低体重指数、血清乳酸或肌酐浓度升高。大多数患者(77%)在医院死亡,伴有肠缺血的患者早期死亡。在存活至 90 天的 NoLap 患者中(21%),77%返回家庭,需要增加护理需求。

结论

本研究报告称,NoLap 患者人群由于其极高水平的合并症、虚弱和生理状况,带来了重大的医疗挑战。尽管存在这些复杂性,仍有五分之一的患者在 90 天内存活。进一步的工作正在进行中,以探讨这一高风险的决策过程。

临床试验注册

ISRCTN81633244。

相似文献

1
Characterisation of older patients that require, but do not undergo, emergency laparotomy: a multicentre cohort study.需要但未接受急诊剖腹手术的老年患者特征:一项多中心队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;133(5):973-982. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Influence of frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a UK-based observational study.衰弱对接受急诊剖腹手术的老年患者的影响:一项基于英国的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017928.
3
Clinical frailty and its effect on the septuagenarian population after emergency laparotomy.临床虚弱及其对 70 岁以上急诊剖腹手术后人群的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Mar;103(3):180-185. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7028.
4
Special needs of frail people undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery.虚弱人群接受急诊剖腹手术的特殊需求。
Age Ageing. 2020 Jul 1;49(4):540-543. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa058.
5
Investigation of frailty markers including a novel biomarker panel in emergency laparotomy: protocol of a prospective cohort study.在急诊剖腹术中研究脆弱性标志物,包括一个新的生物标志物面板:一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02093-5.
6
Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study.老年急诊剖腹手术患者的脆弱性:来自英国观察性急诊剖腹手术和脆弱性(ELF)研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.
7
Comparison of the clinical frailty score (CFS) to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) risk calculator in all patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.比较所有接受紧急剖腹手术患者的临床虚弱评分(CFS)与国家紧急剖腹手术审计(NELA)风险计算器。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jun;24(6):782-789. doi: 10.1111/codi.16089. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
8
Association between preadmission frailty and care level at discharge in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy.老年急诊剖腹术患者入院前虚弱与出院时护理水平的关系。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):218-226. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11392. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
A prospective cohort study characterising patients declined emergency laparotomy: survival in the 'NoLap' population.一项前瞻性队列研究描述了拒绝急诊剖腹手术的患者特征:“不剖腹”人群的生存率。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/anae.14839. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
10
Validation of the emergency surgery score (ESS) in a UK patient population and comparison with NELA scoring: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.验证英国患者人群中的紧急手术评分(ESS),并与 NELA 评分进行比较:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 May;106(5):439-445. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0105. Epub 2024 Mar 13.