• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适合国王的猜测？来自英国王室的医疗公告以及医生反复出现的个人隐私和公众评论的伦理复杂性。

Speculation fit for a king? Medical announcements from the British royal family and the recurring ethical complexities of personal privacy and public commentary from physicians.

机构信息

Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Bern, Hochschulstrasse 4, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 4;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0
PMID:39367413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11451130/
Abstract

This article explores the ethical complexities of openly-expressed medical commentary using recent cancer diagnoses within the British monarchy as illustrative cases. Specifically, it examines tensions between public interest, personal privacy, and professional standards, underlining the adverse implications of conjectural discourse, alongside the role of physicians in enhancing wider medical understanding.

摘要

本文以英国王室近期的癌症诊断为例，探讨了公开表达医学评论所涉及的伦理复杂性。具体而言，本文考察了公共利益、个人隐私和专业标准之间的紧张关系，强调了推测性言论的不利影响，以及医生在增进更广泛的医学理解方面的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8087/11451130/73d1d02528d3/12910_2024_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8087/11451130/b487f86d77da/12910_2024_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8087/11451130/73d1d02528d3/12910_2024_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8087/11451130/b487f86d77da/12910_2024_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8087/11451130/73d1d02528d3/12910_2024_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Speculation fit for a king? Medical announcements from the British royal family and the recurring ethical complexities of personal privacy and public commentary from physicians.适合国王的猜测？来自英国王室的医疗公告以及医生反复出现的个人隐私和公众评论的伦理复杂性。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 4;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0.
2
Navigating ethics of physician-patient confidentiality: a communication privacy management analysis.探讨医患保密的伦理问题：一项传播隐私管理分析。
Perm J. 2012 Fall;16(4):41-5. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-042.
3
The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.《双螺旋：将关怀伦理应用于向基因亲属告知基因信息的义务》
Bioethics. 2016 Mar;30(3):181-7. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12176. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media.美国医学协会伦理与司法事务委员会报告：社交媒体使用中的职业素养
J Clin Ethics. 2011 Summer;22(2):165-72.
5
Physician, monitor thyself: professionalism and accountability in the use of social media.医生，审视自身：社交媒体使用中的专业精神与责任
J Clin Ethics. 2011 Summer;22(2):187-90.
6
Annual report of Council, 1986-1987: medical ethics.1986 - 1987年理事会年度报告：医学伦理学
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Mar 28;294(6575):suppl 28-30.
7
Professional Ethics, Personal Conscience, and Public Expectations.职业道德、个人良知与公众期望。
J Clin Ethics. 2016 Fall;27(3):233-237.
8
Contraception, adolescence, and ethics in Brazil: are we prepared?巴西的避孕、青少年与伦理：我们准备好了吗？
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):529-36. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.4.529.
9
Professional Ethics for Digital Age Psychiatry: Boundaries, Privacy, and Communication.数字时代精神病学的职业道德：边界、隐私与沟通
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):55. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0815-5.
10
The poet, the biographer and the shrink: psychiatrist-patient confidentiality and the Anne Sexton biography.诗人、传记作者与精神科医生：精神科医生与患者的保密问题及安妮·塞克斯顿的传记
Univ Miami Entertain Sports Law Rev. 1993;10(1-2):117-64.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-sectional study of policies from American medical organizations about public communications from physicians in the digital age.一项关于美国医学组织在数字时代发布医生公共信息的政策的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 28;14(1):29566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81176-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics and disinformation on the campaign trail: psychiatry, the Goldwater Rule, and the 2024 United States presidential election.竞选活动中的伦理与虚假信息：精神病学、戈德华特法则与2024年美国总统大选
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Feb 6;31:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100692. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Mental health-related limitations and political leadership in Germany: A multidisciplinary analysis of legal, psychiatric, and ethical frameworks.德国与心理健康相关的限制因素及政治领导力：对法律、精神病学和伦理框架的多学科分析
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;89:101908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101908. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
The Goldwater Rule at 50 and its relevance in Europe: Examining the positions of National Psychiatric Association Members of the European Psychiatric Association.
《金特法则》50 年及其在欧洲的相关性：研究欧洲精神病学协会国家精神病学协会成员的立场。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 24;66(1):e34. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.22.
4
The illness and death of King George VI of England: the pathologists' reassessment.英国国王乔治六世的疾病与死亡：病理学家的重新评估
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2021 Jul-Aug;53:107340. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2021.107340. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Not the Last Word: A Goldwater Rule for Sports Medicine.并非最终定论：运动医学的戈德华特规则。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1149-1153. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533612.13677.63.
6
Psychosocial factors that influence men's help-seeking for cancer symptoms: a systematic synthesis of mixed methods research.影响男性癌症症状求助行为的社会心理因素：混合方法研究的系统综述
Psychooncology. 2015 Oct;24(10):1222-1232. doi: 10.1002/pon.3912. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Speculating on a public figure's mental health.猜测公众人物的心理健康状况。
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Oct 1;15(10):829-33. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.10.ecas1-1310.
8
Disclosing a cancer diagnosis to friends and family: a gendered analysis of young men's and women's experiences.向朋友和家人透露癌症诊断结果：对年轻男性和女性经历的性别分析。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jun;19(6):744-54. doi: 10.1177/1049732309334737. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
9
Medical privacy and the public's right to vote: what presidential candidates should disclose.医疗隐私与公众投票权：总统候选人应披露的信息。
J Med Philos. 2006 Aug;31(4):417-39. doi: 10.1080/03605310600860825.