Suppr超能文献

阿伐曲泊帕治疗对艾曲泊帕/海曲泊帕不耐受或无效的免疫性血小板减少症的真实世界证据。

Real-world evidence of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia intolerant or ineffective to eltrombopag/hetrombopag.

作者信息

Tian Hong, Zhou Lu, Dai Jia-Wen, Li Yun, Gu Cheng-Yuan, Kong Dan-Qing, Yu Zi-Qiang, Liu Xiao-Fan, Yin Jie

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2024 Dec;205(6):2414-2424. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19800. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

Abstract

Due to the limited real-world research on the application of avatrombopag (AVA) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in China, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of AVA in clinical practice. We included 121 adult ITP patients treated with AVA across three medical centres. Based on the reasons for choosing AVA, these patients were divided into eltrombopag (ELT)/hetrombopag (HET) intolerance group (IG), and ELT/HET unresponsive group (UG). Compared with UG, more patients in IG had a history of liver disease and received fewer treatments before AVA. Amongst all patients, 83% had platelet response (≥30 × 10/L) after AVA and 62% achieved complete response (≥100 × 10/L, CR). Sixty-two percent in IG and 56% in UG were able to discontinue more than one concomitant ITP medication. A total of 17 patients underwent multiple switches of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), resulting in an 88% platelet response rate. Sixty-three patients discontinued AVA, 27% were due to unaffordability. AVA was well tolerated in most patients. In the ITP population, AVA proved effective and safe, particularly in patients intolerant or unresponsive to ELT/HET. Patients benefited from TPO-RAs switches, particularly those undergoing multiple switches. However, many patients struggled with the long-term financial burden of AVA.

摘要

由于在中国,关于阿伐曲泊帕(AVA)用于免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的真实世界研究有限,我们评估了AVA在临床实践中的有效性和安全性。我们纳入了三个医疗中心接受AVA治疗的121例成年ITP患者。根据选择AVA的原因,这些患者被分为艾曲泊帕(ELT)/海曲泊帕(HET)不耐受组(IG)和ELT/HET无反应组(UG)。与UG相比,IG中有更多患者有肝病病史,且在使用AVA之前接受的治疗较少。在所有患者中,83%的患者在使用AVA后出现血小板反应(≥30×10⁹/L),62%的患者达到完全缓解(≥100×10⁹/L,CR)。IG组62%的患者和UG组56%的患者能够停用一种以上的ITP伴随用药。共有17例患者多次更换血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs),血小板反应率达88%。63例患者停用了AVA,27%是由于负担不起。大多数患者对AVA耐受性良好。在ITP患者群体中,AVA被证明是有效和安全的,特别是在对ELT/HET不耐受或无反应的患者中。患者从TPO-RAs的更换中获益,特别是那些多次更换的患者。然而,许多患者在AVA的长期经济负担方面面临困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验