Giampetruzzi Eugenia, Walker Elaine F, Addington Jean, Bearden Carrie E, Cadenhead Kristin S, Cannon Tyrone D, Cornblatt Barbara A, Keshavan Matcheri, Mathalon Daniel H, Perkins Diana O, Stone William S, Woods Scott W, LoPilato Allison M
Emory University, USA.
Emory University, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Dec;342:116214. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116214. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
Research has established that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) confer risk for psychiatric diagnoses, and that protective factors moderate this association. Investigation into the effect of protective factors in the relationship between ACEs and internalizing disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety) is limited in high-risk groups. The present study investigated the relationship between ACEs and risk for internalizing disorders in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and tests the hypothesis that protective factors moderate this relationship.
688 participants aged 12-30 (M = 18; SD = 4.05) meeting criteria for CHR-P were administered measures of child adversity, protective factors (SAVRY), and diagnostic assessment (SCID- 5). Logistic regression tested whether ACEs predicted internalizing disorders. Moderation regression analyses determined whether these associations were weaker in the presence of protective factors.
RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of ACEs predicted history of depressive disorder (β = 0.26(1.30), p < .001), self-harm/suicide attempts (β = 0.34(1.40), p < .001), and substance use (β = 0.14(1.15), p = .04). Childhood sexual abuse (β = 0.77(2.15), p = .001), emotional neglect (β = 0.38(1.46), p = .05), and psychological abuse (β = 0.42(1.52), p = .04), predicted self- harm/suicide attempts. Sexual abuse (β = 1.00 (2.72), p = .001), and emotional neglect (β = 0.53(1.71), p = .011), were also linked to depressive disorder. There was no association between ACEs and anxiety disorder, and no moderation effect of protective factors in the relationship between ACEs and psychiatric outcomes. These findings add nuance to a growing literature linking ACEs to psychopathology and highlight the importance of investigation into the mechanisms that may buffer this relationship.
研究表明,童年不良经历(ACEs)会增加精神疾病诊断的风险,而保护因素会缓和这种关联。在高危人群中,对保护因素在ACEs与内化性障碍(如抑郁症、焦虑症)之间关系中的作用的研究有限。本研究调查了处于临床高危精神病状态(CHR-P)的青少年中ACEs与内化性障碍风险之间的关系,并检验保护因素会缓和这种关系的假设。
对688名年龄在12 - 30岁(M = 18;SD = 4.05)符合CHR-P标准的参与者进行了儿童逆境、保护因素(SAVRY)和诊断评估(SCID-5)的测量。逻辑回归检验ACEs是否能预测内化性障碍。调节回归分析确定在存在保护因素的情况下这些关联是否较弱。
较高水平的ACEs可预测抑郁症病史(β = 0.26(1.30),p <.001)、自我伤害/自杀未遂(β = 0.34(1.40),p <.001)和物质使用(β = 0.14(1.15),p =.04)。童年性虐待(β = 0.77(2.15),p =.001)、情感忽视(β = 0.38(1.46),p =.05)和心理虐待(β = 0.42(1.52),p =.04)可预测自我伤害/自杀未遂。性虐待(β = 1.00 (2.72),p =.001)和情感忽视(β = 0.53(1.71),p =.011)也与抑郁症有关。ACEs与焦虑症之间没有关联,并且保护因素在ACEs与精神疾病结果之间的关系中没有调节作用。这些发现为将ACEs与精神病理学联系起来的不断增长的文献增添了细微差别,并强调了研究可能缓冲这种关系的机制的重要性。