• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物瓣与机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2025 Jan-Feb;69:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.016
PMID:39369559
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve disease(AVD) accounts for 33 % of valvular heart disease(VHD) but causes over 60 % of VHD mortality. For surgical AVR, mechanical valves are recommended for patients <50 years old and bioprosthetic valves for those >70 years old.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the long-term differences following AV replacement(AVR) comparing bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in patients aged 50-70.

METHODS

4,927 patients underwent AVR, 744 of which were propensity-matched 2:1 for bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. Outcomes included mortality, morbidity, and rates of reoperation.

RESULTS

The average age of the propensity-matched groups was 57 and 56.7 years, and female sex accounted for 26.4 % and 25.0 % for the bioprosthetic and mechanical valve groups, respectively. Other baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar between the groups. There were no deaths at 30 days and complication rates did not differ between groups(p > 0.05). Mortality at 1, 5, and 15 years was similar between groups. Reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years did not significantly differ between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves(p = 0.84, p = 0.31), although at 15-year follow-up, patients with bioprosthetic valves were more likely to require reoperation(21.2 % versus 9.7 %, adjusted hazard ratio 3.65, 95 % confidence interval 1.07-12.5, p = 0.0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving AVR from 50 to 70 years old have similar long-term outcomes irrespective of whether they received bioprosthetic or mechanical valves, with only reoperation being significantly different at 15 years follow-up. With low rates of reoperation, mortality, and avoidance of anticoagulation, bioprosthetic valves are a reasonable option for patients 50-70 years old, although mechanical valves still provide a durability benefit for young patients.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣疾病(AVD)占瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)的 33%,但导致 60%以上的 VHD 死亡。对于外科 AVR,建议 50 岁以下的患者使用机械瓣膜,70 岁以上的患者使用生物瓣膜。

目的

比较 50-70 岁患者行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后使用生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜的长期差异。

方法

4927 例患者接受了 AVR,其中 744 例患者按倾向评分以 2:1 的比例匹配生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜。结果包括死亡率、发病率和再次手术率。

结果

倾向评分匹配组的平均年龄分别为 57 岁和 56.7 岁,女性比例分别为生物瓣膜组 26.4%和机械瓣膜组 25.0%。两组的其他基线人口统计学和合并症相似。两组 30 天内均无死亡,并发症发生率无差异(p>0.05)。两组 1、5 和 15 年的死亡率相似。5 年和 10 年的再次手术率在生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜之间无显著差异(p=0.84,p=0.31),尽管在 15 年随访时,生物瓣膜组患者更需要再次手术(21.2%对 9.7%,调整后的危险比 3.65,95%置信区间 1.07-12.5,p=0.039)。

结论

50-70 岁接受 AVR 的患者无论接受生物瓣膜还是机械瓣膜,长期预后相似,只有在 15 年随访时再次手术有显著差异。由于再次手术率、死亡率低,且无需抗凝,生物瓣膜对于 50-70 岁的患者是合理的选择,尽管机械瓣膜仍为年轻患者提供了耐用性优势。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves.生物瓣与机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的长期结果。
Heart Lung. 2025 Jan-Feb;69:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.美敦力汉考克二代与双叶机械主动脉瓣置换术在60岁以下患者中的中长期疗效比较:倾向匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):280-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv347. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
3
Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.50 岁至 69 岁患者行生物瓣与机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的生存和长期预后。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1323-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12679.
4
National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的使用情况及院内结局的全国趋势。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1262-9.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.052. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
5
Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.主动脉位置植入生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜的非老年患者的远期疗效比较:一项倾向匹配分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1931-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.042. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
6
Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.不同年龄组倾向性匹配患者中单纯机械瓣与生物瓣二尖瓣置换术的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 1;66(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae245.
7
Age-Based Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valves.基于生物瓣与机械瓣的主动脉瓣置换术后年龄相关的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.在透析患者中,主动脉瓣置换的机械瓣与生物瓣:系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2024 Nov;32(8-9):484-493. doi: 10.1177/02184923241301108.
9
Mechanical vs Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Hazard Ratio Meta-analysis.70 岁以下患者行机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的比较:风险比荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;38(3):355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.孤立生物瓣与机械主动脉瓣置换术后长期生存相似:倾向匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1444-1455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.181. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The choice of surgical aortic valve replacement type and mid-term outcomes in 50 to 65-year-olds: results of the AUTHEARTVISIT study.50至65岁人群手术主动脉瓣置换类型的选择及中期结果:AUTHEARTVISIT研究结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 1;67(7). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf200.