School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Environ Pollut. 2024 Dec 15;363(Pt 1):125078. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125078. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
Artificial light at night (ALAN) and urban noise are increasing globally and can have a range of impacts on wildlife. While ALAN and noise often co-occur and can affect wildlife in similar ways, their impacts have generally been studied in isolation. Information about possible interactive impacts, which can be more serious, is critical to guide conservation. We studied how noise and ALAN impact a common urban waterbird (Eurasian coot Fulica atra) around the city of Melbourne in south-eastern Australia. We aimed to examine: (1) the individual and (2) interactive impacts of noise and ALAN on abundance, and (3) the relative influence of these stressors and other environmental predictors. To do so, we used data from a large-scale (1,463 surveys across an area of 9,250 km with significant heterogeneity in noise and ALAN conditions), long-term (2008-2018) monitoring program, overlaid with georeferenced noise and light data. We used generalized linear mixed effects models and boosted regression trees to model individual and interactive effects of ALAN and noise on abundance. Abundance was negatively correlated with noise and ALAN individually. Furthermore, the two stressors had a negative synergistic effect, ultimately resulting in the absence of coots at the highest observed ALAN and noise levels. We also estimate that the combined influence of the two stressors on abundance was larger than that of other examined environmental factors. Our findings that noise and ALAN have detrimental interactive impacts is worrying for two reasons. First, Eurasian coots are thought to be tolerant to urbanisation, so impacts may be more severe for less tolerant species. Second, noise and ALAN commonly co-occur around cities, so similar impacts are likely elsewhere. By adopting more biologically and ecologically realistic analytical frameworks, future studies can better estimate the cumulative impacts of multiple stressors to facilitate improved conservation and management.
人工夜间照明(ALAN)和城市噪声在全球范围内不断增加,可能对野生动物产生一系列影响。虽然 ALAN 和噪声经常同时出现,并以相似的方式影响野生动物,但它们的影响通常是孤立研究的。有关可能更严重的交互影响的信息对于指导保护至关重要。我们研究了噪声和 ALAN 如何影响澳大利亚东南部墨尔本市周围的一种常见城市水鸟(欧亚黑水鸡 Fulica atra)。我们的目的是检查:(1)噪声和 ALAN 对数量的单独影响,以及(2)个体影响,(3)这些压力源和其他环境预测因子的相对影响。为此,我们使用了来自一个大规模(在噪声和 ALAN 条件具有显著异质性的 9250 平方公里的区域内进行了 1463 次调查)、长期(2008-2018 年)监测计划的数据,这些数据与地理参考噪声和光照数据重叠。我们使用广义线性混合效应模型和增强回归树来模拟 ALAN 和噪声对数量的单独和交互影响。数量与噪声和 ALAN 单独呈负相关。此外,这两种压力源具有负协同作用,最终导致在观察到的最高 ALAN 和噪声水平下,黑水鸡不存在。我们还估计,这两种压力源对数量的综合影响大于其他检查的环境因素。我们发现噪声和 ALAN 具有有害的交互影响,这有两个原因令人担忧。首先,人们认为欧亚黑水鸡对城市化具有耐受性,因此对耐受性较低的物种的影响可能更严重。其次,噪声和 ALAN 在城市周围通常同时出现,因此其他地方也可能出现类似的影响。通过采用更具生物和生态现实意义的分析框架,未来的研究可以更好地估计多种压力源的累积影响,从而促进更好的保护和管理。