Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou, PR China.
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases & Shaanxi International Joint Research Centre for Oral Diseases, Centre for Tissue Engineering, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, PR China; Department of General Dentistry, Xiamen University Affiliated Chenggong Hospital & The 73rd Army Hospital of Chinese PLA, Amoy, Fujian, PR China.
J Dent. 2024 Nov;150:105392. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105392. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
This quantitative systematic review evaluated whether pulpotomy performed with hydraulic calcium silicate cements may be used as an alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) in mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure.
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. No language restrictions were applied. The search included randomised controlled trials that compared pulpotomy to root canal treatment for managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth.
Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials involving mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements for pulpotomy. Non-comparative studies, case reports, and trials involving primary or immature permanent teeth were excluded.
Data were extracted on success rates, clinical outcomes, follow-up periods, pain profiles, and potential complications. A meta-analysis was performed, revealing no statistically significant differences in success rates between pulpotomy and RCT. Both interventions demonstrated success rates exceeding 90 % at one-year and two-year follow-up periods. Pain profiles consistently showed lower post-operative pain intensity in the pulpotomy group compared to the RCT group during the first week. Potential complications, such as non-responsive pulp and difficulties in determining pulp vitality, were reported more frequently in the pulpotomy group.
Pulpotomy with bioactive hydraulic calcium silicate cements shows comparable success rates to RCT in managing carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth. The results suggest pulpotomy as a viable, less invasive alternative to RCT, particularly in cases where preservation of pulp vitality is paramount.
This systematic review highlights pulpotomy as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative to root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. With comparable success rates and lower post-operative pain, pulpotomy offers a promising approach to managing carious exposure and preserving tooth vitality.
本定量系统评价评估了在成熟恒牙牙髓暴露的情况下,使用水硬性硅酸钙水泥行活髓切断术是否可以替代根管治疗(RCT)。
在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了全面检索。未设置语言限制。检索包括比较活髓切断术与 RCT 治疗成熟恒牙牙髓暴露的随机对照试验。
根据预定的纳入标准选择研究:涉及牙髓暴露的成熟恒牙的 RCT,使用水硬性硅酸钙水泥行活髓切断术。排除非对照研究、病例报告和涉及乳牙或未成熟恒牙的试验。
提取成功率、临床结果、随访期、疼痛谱和潜在并发症的数据。进行了荟萃分析,发现活髓切断术与 RCT 的成功率无统计学差异。两种干预措施在一年和两年随访期的成功率均超过 90%。疼痛谱显示,在术后第一周,活髓切断术组的术后疼痛强度明显低于 RCT 组。活髓切断术组报告的无反应性牙髓和确定牙髓活力困难等潜在并发症更为频繁。
用生物活性水硬性硅酸钙水泥行活髓切断术与 RCT 治疗成熟恒牙牙髓暴露的成功率相当。结果表明,活髓切断术是 RCT 的一种可行、微创的替代方法,特别是在保护牙髓活力至关重要的情况下。
本系统评价强调了活髓切断术作为一种微创、经济有效的替代 RCT 的方法,用于成熟恒牙。活髓切断术具有相当的成功率和较低的术后疼痛,为管理牙髓暴露和保存牙齿活力提供了一种有前途的方法。