Parsons Barbara L
US Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson AR 72079, USA.
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2024 Jul-Dec;794:108514. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2024.108514. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
Advanced sequencing technologies (ASTs) have revolutionized the quantitation of cancer driver mutations (CDMs) as rare events, which has utility in clinical oncology, cancer research, and cancer risk assessment. This review focuses on studies that have used ASTs to characterize clonal expansion (CE) of cells carrying CDMs and to explicate the selective pressures that shape CE. Importantly, high-sensitivity ASTs have made possible the characterization of mutant clones and CE in histologically normal tissue samples, providing the means to investigate nascent tumor development. Some ASTs can identify mutant clones in a spatially defined context; others enable integration of mutant data with analyses of gene expression, thereby elaborating immune, inflammatory, metabolic, and/or stromal microenvironmental impacts on CE. As a whole, these studies make it clear that a startlingly large fraction of cells in histologically normal tissues carry CDMs, CDMs may confer a context-specific selective advantage leading to CE, and only a small fraction of cells carrying CDMs eventually result in neoplasia. These observations were integrated with available literature regarding the mechanisms underlying clonal selection to interpret how measurements of CDMs and CE can be interpreted as biomarkers of cancer risk. Given the stochastic nature of carcinogenesis, the potential functional latency of driver mutations, the complexity of potential mutational and microenvironmental interactions, and involvement of other types of genetic and epigenetic changes, it is concluded that CDM-based measurements should be viewed as probabilistic rather than deterministic biomarkers. Increasing inter-sample variability in CDM levels (as a consequence of CE) may be interpretable as a shift away from normal tissue homeostasis and an indication of increased future cancer risk, a process that may reflect normal aging or carcinogen exposure. Consequently, analyses of variability in levels of CDMs have the potential to bolster existing approaches for carcinogenicity testing.
先进测序技术(ASTs)彻底改变了对作为罕见事件的癌症驱动突变(CDMs)的定量分析,这在临床肿瘤学、癌症研究和癌症风险评估中具有实用价值。本综述聚焦于那些利用ASTs来表征携带CDMs的细胞的克隆扩增(CE)以及阐释塑造CE的选择压力的研究。重要的是,高灵敏度ASTs使得对组织学正常组织样本中的突变克隆和CE进行表征成为可能,为研究新生肿瘤的发展提供了手段。一些ASTs能够在空间定义的背景下识别突变克隆;其他ASTs则能将突变数据与基因表达分析相结合,从而阐明免疫、炎症、代谢和/或基质微环境对CE的影响。总体而言,这些研究清楚地表明,组织学正常组织中惊人比例的细胞携带CDMs,CDMs可能赋予特定背景下的选择优势从而导致CE,而只有一小部分携带CDMs的细胞最终会发展为肿瘤。这些观察结果与关于克隆选择潜在机制的现有文献相结合,以解释如何将CDMs和CE的测量结果解释为癌症风险的生物标志物。鉴于致癌作用的随机性、驱动突变潜在的功能潜伏期、潜在突变与微环境相互作用的复杂性以及其他类型遗传和表观遗传变化的参与,得出的结论是,基于CDM的测量应被视为概率性而非确定性的生物标志物。CDM水平样本间变异性的增加(由于CE)可能被解释为偏离正常组织稳态以及未来癌症风险增加的迹象,这一过程可能反映正常衰老或致癌物暴露。因此,对CDMs水平变异性的分析有可能加强现有的致癌性测试方法。