The Interval of Computed Tomography Follow-Ups after Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Surgery Did Not Show Any Relationship with Survival.

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence concerning the computed tomography (CT) follow-up interval to detect recurrence and second primary cancers after surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of CT interval on survival after surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the prognosis of 103 patients who underwent periodic CT after complete resection for pathological stage II-III NSCLC at a single institute between 2015 and 2020. The patients were stratified based on the follow-up CT intervals into the half-year group (Group H) and annual group (Group A). Additionally, the underlying differences in clinical backgrounds between the 2 groups were adjusted by propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (Group H, 76 patients; Group A, 27 patients) were included in this study. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the unmatched cohort were 83.5% and 95.2% in groups H and A, respectively ( P = 0.17). Among the matched cohort, 42 and 21 patients were in groups H and A. The 5-year OS rates of the matched cohort were 89.8% and 94.4% in groups H and A ( P = 0.45), with no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between CT intervals and postoperative survival.